From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtpout.karoo.kcom.com (smtpout.karoo.kcom.com [212.50.160.34]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A55B6E8DE for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 21:24:42 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,503,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="64617440" Received: from deneb.mcrowe.com ([82.152.148.4]) by smtpout.karoo.kcom.com with ESMTP; 18 Feb 2014 21:24:42 +0000 Received: from mac by deneb.mcrowe.com with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WFs9i-0005pS-Qc; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 21:24:42 +0000 Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 21:24:42 +0000 From: Mike Crowe To: Khem Raj Message-ID: <20140218212442.GA22168@mcrowe.com> References: <20140218205346.GA21359@mcrowe.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: boost: Ineffective compileflags and linkflags in user-config.jam X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 21:24:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 18 February 2014 at 13:01:31 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Mike Crowe wrote: > > or should users of this recipe be given a convenient ability to override > > the compileflags, with perhaps something like: > > > > 'using gcc ; 4.3.1 : ${CXX} : "${CFLAGS}" "${CXXFLAGS}" ;' > > this one. care to send a patch ? Hi Khem, I can do once I've tested it against current master. Thanks. Mike.