From: Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu@intel.com>
To: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] package_manager.py: RpmPM: don't add smart channel if already added
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 17:42:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140303154240.GB21480@lpalcu-linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5314998B.8050102@windriver.com>
Hi Mark,
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 09:02:35AM -0600, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 3/3/14, 3:43 AM, Laurentiu Palcu wrote:
> >Make sure the channel was not already added, before attempting to add.
> >
> >[YOCTO #5890]
>
> When generating the rootfs/etc/rpm/platform file, the order should
> be in the order of highest to lowest priority as well.
>
> Smart uses this order (via an RPM API) to help determine scores when
> two packages from repositories at the same priority (with different
> architectures) are selected.
Thanks for the info. This patchset should restore the behavior to the
one you describe. Python's sets messed up the order, so I reverted that
patch.
laurentiu
>
> --Mark
>
> >Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu <laurentiu.palcu@intel.com>
> >---
> > meta/lib/oe/package_manager.py | 6 ++++--
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/package_manager.py b/meta/lib/oe/package_manager.py
> >index 6c133c3..ee42952 100644
> >--- a/meta/lib/oe/package_manager.py
> >+++ b/meta/lib/oe/package_manager.py
> >@@ -604,11 +604,11 @@ class RpmPM(PackageManager):
> > # self._invoke_smart('config --set rpm-log-level=debug')
> > # cmd = 'config --set rpm-log-file=/tmp/smart-debug-logfile'
> > # self._invoke_smart(cmd)
> >-
> >+ ch_already_added = []
> > for canonical_arch in platform_extra:
> > arch = canonical_arch.split('-')[0]
> > arch_channel = os.path.join(self.deploy_dir, arch)
> >- if os.path.exists(arch_channel):
> >+ if os.path.exists(arch_channel) and not arch in ch_already_added:
> > bb.note('Note: adding Smart channel %s (%s)' %
> > (arch, channel_priority))
> > self._invoke_smart('channel --add %s type=rpm-md baseurl=%s -y'
> >@@ -617,6 +617,8 @@ class RpmPM(PackageManager):
> > (arch, channel_priority))
> > channel_priority -= 5
> >
> >+ ch_already_added.append(arch)
> >+
> > bb.note('adding Smart RPM DB channel')
> > self._invoke_smart('channel --add rpmsys type=rpm-sys -y')
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-03 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-03 9:43 [PATCH 0/2] fix package archs ordering for RPM Laurentiu Palcu
2014-03-03 9:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] Revert "lib/oe/package_manager.py: RpmPM: fix issue with multilib builds" Laurentiu Palcu
2014-03-04 18:37 ` Kamble, Nitin A
2014-03-03 9:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] package_manager.py: RpmPM: don't add smart channel if already added Laurentiu Palcu
2014-03-03 15:02 ` Mark Hatle
2014-03-03 15:42 ` Laurentiu Palcu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140303154240.GB21480@lpalcu-linux \
--to=laurentiu.palcu@intel.com \
--cc=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox