Re: [PATCH 0/3] Replace ocf-linux with cryptodev-linux

[Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>]

On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 01:18:32PM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:42:39AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> Hello Kai,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Kai Kang <kai.kang@windriver.com> wrote:
> >> > Replace ocf-linux with cryptodev-linux because linux-yocto use cryptodev-linux to implement /dev/crypto.
> >>
> >> Thanks for handling it; I was going to address same issue this week so
> >> we could have it upstreamed and drop the Freescale bbappends for it.
> >
> > So, we also have a recipe of cryptodev for TI builds. But it's not just a
> > header file and we need the actual module to be built and packaged...
> 
> As long as something out of tree can co-exist with in-tree implementations,
> I don't see a problem with an incremental update that builds the module
> as well.

Thanks. So, I already have cryptodev-tests as a separate recipe that builds 
some tests from the same source, as main cryptodev. I guess I can look into 
separating module part into cryptodev-module recipe, which can be optional for 
kernels like linux-yocto that have it already patched in. Will that work?

-- 
Denys