From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vms173025pub.verizon.net (vms173025pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.25]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A54C865D24 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 17:27:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [71.191.205.189]) by vms173025.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0N4E005PY5SD2R00@vms173025.mailsrvcs.net> for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 12:26:48 -0500 (CDT) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B91E7201BF; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 13:26:37 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 13:26:37 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Richard Purdie Message-id: <20140421172637.GQ11339@denix.org> References: <1396324451-26983-1-git-send-email-denis@denix.org> <20140406224639.GD3370@denix.org> <5342C918.5030307@linux.intel.com> <20140407210549.GI3370@denix.org> <1396909331.24597.84.camel@ted> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <1396909331.24597.84.camel@ted> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] udev-extraconf: update mount.sh to use /run/media instead of /media X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 17:27:06 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 11:22:11PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 17:05 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > I understand the timing concern and am fine waiting another week for when 1.7 > > window opens. > > > > But I'm slightly confused as to since when OE-Core is concerned about breaking > > bbappends in other layers? I guess some layers are not created equal, eh? :) > > The question is more one of timing. I don't think its reasonable that we > break things like that between -rc2 and -rc3 of 1.6 without a better > reason... > > I'm even nervous changing the sstate checksums but I think the CONFFILES > change does warrant that for example. Is 1.7 window now open? Should I resubmit this patch again? Thanks. -- Denys