From: Paul Barker <paul@paulbarker.me.uk>
To: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
Cc: OE Core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: gpgme-config
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 11:26:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140808112653.GG32767@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140723144952.GG22875@jama>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2825 bytes --]
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 04:49:52PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 01:51:23PM +0000, Paul Barker wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm trying to build opkg with 'gpg' added to PACKAGECONFIG on the master branch
> > of OE. The gpg support for opkg is provided by gpgme, which uses 'gpgme-config'
> > to determine CFLAGS and LIBS when building. After recent changes, the
> > gpgme-config script is now just a dummy and doesn't do anything.
> >
> > Upstream gpgme do not provide a pkg-config file and an upstream issue about this
> > raised in 2012 was resolved WONTFIX (https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue1414).
> >
> > Our options are:
> >
> > 1) Add a .pc file to gpgme and maintain it within OE as it is very unlikely to
> > be accepted upstream. Then I need to modify configure.ac in opkg to support
> > both this pkg-config file (for OE) and the gpgme-config utility (for all
> > other users of opkg).
>
> This comment in original issue:
> The gpgme-config scripts goes along with the gpgme.m4 code. A .pc file
> won't be able to do what we can do with this combination.
>
> Makes me think that if we implement .pc.in which generates correct .pc
> from gpgme.m4 he won't be against accepting such patch upstream.
>
> I think that biggest reason against -config scripts was that they aren't
> cross-compile friendly (not sysroot-aware) so you either have whole path
> to sysroot hardcoded in -config file and then have to mangle it for
> target -dev package or vice versa and you need to prefix returned values
> (like -I -L flags with sysroot).
>
> > 2) Make an exception to the policy on -config scripts for gpgme.
> >
> > I haven't really followed the discussion on why -config scripts needed to be
> > removed so I'll put this question to other OE developers. Would option (2) cause
> > more problems in the long run? If so, is it worth the extra effort to follow
> > option (1)?
> >
> > I'll probably need someone to bounce a few autoconf and pkg-config questions off
> > if I implement option (1) as I'm not very familiar with either system.
>
> I'm no expert in this as well, but there are some examples we can copy.
>
I think I've got this now. I've created a 'gpgme.pc' file by adapting 'lua.pc'
from meta-openembedded. The Libs and Cflags were found by running 'gpgme-config'
on my development machine and they seem fairly sensible. I've then used
PKG_CHECK_MODULES() in 'configure.ac' within opkg to find gpgme using that
pkg-config file.
I'll send in a couple of patches but I'll delay the changes to 'configure.ac' in
opkg. I should be releasing opkg-0.2.3 in the next few weeks and that will
include the necessary changes.
Thanks,
--
Paul Barker
Email: paul@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 484 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-08 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-23 13:51 gpgme-config Paul Barker
2014-07-23 14:31 ` gpgme-config Richard Purdie
2014-07-23 14:49 ` gpgme-config Martin Jansa
2014-08-08 11:26 ` Paul Barker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140808112653.GG32767@gmail.com \
--to=paul@paulbarker.me.uk \
--cc=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox