From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9158865D5E for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 20:20:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (frontend1.mail.intern.m-online.net [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3hX7pk0mYVz3hhvl; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 22:20:45 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: dEq7UddoGqXQ07f88nJDCqDasPZrqVxfPX4Muj4sgH4= Received: from chi.localnet (unknown [195.140.253.167]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-auth.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3hX7pj4rNlz7S6Rg; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 22:20:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Marek Vasut To: Richard Purdie Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 20:26:32 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.13-trunk-amd64; KDE/4.13.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <1407438629-13369-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de> <201408081422.19749.marex@denx.de> <1407752794.22187.3.camel@ted> In-Reply-To: <1407752794.22187.3.camel@ted> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201408112026.32235.marex@denx.de> Cc: Koen Kooi , OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH] Yocto: Install full set of python modules in Qt SDK toolchain X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 20:20:56 -0000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Monday, August 11, 2014 at 12:26:34 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2014-08-08 at 14:22 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Friday, August 08, 2014 at 07:22:04 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > > Since 'yocto' is a project like freedesktop.org your commit message > > > doesn't make sense, it should be something like: > > > > > > meta-toolchain-qt: Install full set of python modules > > > > Got it, Saul also told me so. I will wait a bit for some more feedback > > and repost with corrections, OK ? Is this approach I took here even > > correct please ? > > I'd really like to see a packagegroup defined somewhere with this list > of python modules which the various recipes can then reference... I agree, that makes sense. Is this approach I took here the correct one please ? Best regards, Marek Vasut