Re: [PATCH 2/2] opkg: Add runtime dep on gnupg if 'gpg' is in PACAKGECONFIG

[Paul Barker <paul@paulbarker.me.uk>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1386 bytes --]

On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 12:16:28PM +0000, Paul Barker wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 02:13:46PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 11:37:09AM +0000, Paul Barker wrote:
> > > The 'opkg-key' utility requires gpg to manage the list of trusted keys. The
> > > ability to verify package signatures is not much use without the ability to add
> > > keys to the trusted list...
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Paul Barker <paul@paulbarker.me.uk>
> > > ---
> > >  meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg.inc | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg.inc
> > > index ba21d84..56c54b6 100644
> > > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg.inc
> > > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg.inc
> > > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ OPKGLIBDIR = "${target_localstatedir}/lib"
> > >  
> > >  PACKAGECONFIG ??= ""
> > >  
> > > -PACKAGECONFIG[gpg] = "--enable-gpg,--disable-gpg,gpgme libgpg-error"
> > > +PACKAGECONFIG[gpg] = "--enable-gpg,--disable-gpg,gpgme libgpg-error,gnupg"
> > 
> > Shouldn't this be gpgme?
> > 
> 
> Which bit? The PACKAGECONFIG name or one of the comma separated fields?
> 

Sorry Martin, I didn't understand your comment. Could you clarify for me?

Thanks,

-- 
Paul Barker

Email: paul@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 484 bytes --]