From: Paul Barker <paul@paulbarker.me.uk>
To: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Cc: openembeded-devel <Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>,
Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: Announcing meta-musl OE/Yocto layer supporting musl C library
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 19:54:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140818195408.GD7174@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140818193102.GC7174@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1904 bytes --]
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 07:31:02PM +0000, Paul Barker wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:14:08PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Paul Barker <paul@paulbarker.me.uk> wrote:
> > >> That would be handy too. But I wanted was to keep this info in project
> > >> for folks to try it out.
> > >>
> > >
> > > I'll just post one ticket for now.
> > >
> >
> > Thats fine too.
> >
> > > I think I've got a fix for e2fsprogs as well.
> >
> > Great. when we write patches that arise out of musl systems we should
> > make sure that
> >
> > 1. If patch fixes a genuine issue surfaced with musl, fight it out ar
> > respective package upstream and in OE universe add it to the original
> > layer where recipe primarily resides
> > but we can keep the patches in meta-musl as a last resort.
> >
> > 2. If its something musl specific then lets keep it in meta-musl and
> > see how musl can be changed to fix it.
> >
> > Thanks
> > -Khem
>
> That makes sense. I'd suggest adding that to the README file in meta-musl so
> other would-be-contributors notice it.
>
> In this case, it's ensuring that 'uint64_t' is used instead of '__uint64_t' and
> that <limits.h> is included where needed for 'PATH_MAX'. So I'd say those fixes
> belong in oe-core and are candidates for submitting upstream.
>
Actually, both of these are fixed upstream already, but not as isolated commits
I can backport. There is a newer upstream release (v1.42.11) but it doesn't
contain the necessary fixes. It appears that the missing <limits.h> inclusion is
in a file added by patches in openembedded-core.
I shan't attempt the upgrade as there are a lot of patches in openembedded-core
to consider. I will try to make an isolated fix for the build issues with musl
though.
Cheers,
--
Paul Barker
Email: paul@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 484 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-18 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-17 0:50 Announcing meta-musl OE/Yocto layer supporting musl C library Khem Raj
2014-08-17 11:50 ` Diego Sueiro
2014-08-17 12:36 ` atulkumar singh
2014-08-18 18:14 ` Paul Barker
2014-08-18 18:26 ` Khem Raj
2014-08-18 18:50 ` Paul Barker
2014-08-18 19:04 ` Khem Raj
2014-08-18 19:08 ` Paul Barker
2014-08-18 19:14 ` Khem Raj
2014-08-18 19:31 ` Paul Barker
2014-08-18 19:54 ` Paul Barker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140818195408.GD7174@gmail.com \
--to=paul@paulbarker.me.uk \
--cc=Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=raj.khem@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox