From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008CD70F52 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 18:34:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hcb.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.41]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.9/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7MIYCXV017049 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:34:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e6410-2 (172.25.40.227) by ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.174.1; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:34:12 -0700 Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 13:33:49 -0500 From: Peter Seebach To: Philip Balister Message-ID: <20140822133349.76751634@e6410-2> In-Reply-To: <53F77370.2060603@balister.org> References: <53F77370.2060603@balister.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Change default for cortexa* to armv7at-neon. X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 18:34:30 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 10:44:32 -0600 Philip Balister wrote: > Can we also move to hard float abi? I'd rather not, just because the reason I care about this at all is that our prebuilt toolchain has a set of binaries for armv7at-neon, but not for hard float ABI. I am reminded, though, of a question I had about all the cortex tunings: Why do they set DEFAULTTUNE to a tuning that isn't one of the ones using the new features they define? -s -- Listen, get this. Nobody with a good compiler needs to be justified.