From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vms173021pub.verizon.net (vms173021pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.21]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2497601A0 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:23:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [108.18.33.160]) by vms173021.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0NC000H9JOYLRGH0@vms173021.mailsrvcs.net> for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 18:23:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D33832037D; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:23:06 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:23:06 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Otavio Salvador Message-id: <20140916232306.GX2480@denix.org> References: <1410665660-25145-1-git-send-email-denis@denix.org> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: OE-core , Denys Dmytriyenko Subject: Re: [PATCH] u-boot: update to version 2014.07 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:23:14 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:41:22AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 15 September 2014 15:33, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> I think it is a way better base for work but I really don't care as I > >> use my own recipe in fsl-arm and so does TI. > > > > And that's the problem really isn't it. :) Why do you both use your > > own recipe, instead of keeping the u-boot in oe-core up to date? The way we use it in meta-ti, is to include u-boot.inc file and add any SRCREV bumps or patches on top. So, the base gets reused. > Well we both require patches; this does not mean we ought to not keep > OE-Core in sync (or close to). > > This is the reason why I advocate for the inclusion. Denys were > working on this update for a while but he must have been pulled out of > it due work commitments as usual ... so it ended sent now. Correct. I meant to finish and submit it last month, but got pulled into resolving other critical issues, hence the delay, sorry. I've submitted a v2 version that splits the changes into 2 patches - cleanup and update. Please provide comments. -- Denys