From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from stoexhub03.domain01.net (STOEXHUB03.domain01.net [83.145.59.144]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3A560167 for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 08:27:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ad.chargestorm.se (83.233.19.145) by stoexhub03.domain01.net (10.12.10.3) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.279.1; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:27:41 +0100 Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:27:04 +0100 From: Anders Darander To: Hongxu Jia Message-ID: <20141113082704.GA19230@ad.chargestorm.se> Mail-Followup-To: Hongxu Jia , Koen Kooi , "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" References: <37d7153a864b4dee5748a3a30054c0c62e243f02.1415699201.git.hongxu.jia@windriver.com> <54640951.3040005@windriver.com> <54640CC9.1080509@windriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <54640CC9.1080509@windriver.com> X-Accept-Language: sv, en, de X-GPG-Fingerprint: 5AF0 B2E9 78FE 9D75 D110 6F8F 3E31 84D7 920E 938C X-GPG-Key-Id: 0x920E938C X-GPG-Keyserver: hkp://keys.gnupg.net Organization: ChargeStorm AB User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-GFI-SMTP-Submission: 1 Cc: Koen Kooi , "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] avahi.inc: rename package to use avahi to instead of avahi-daemon X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 08:27:44 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline * Hongxu Jia [141113 02:44]: > On 11/13/2014 09:28 AM, Hongxu Jia wrote: > > On 11/12/2014 06:27 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: > >>> Op 11 nov. 2014, om 11:52 heeft Hongxu Jia > >>> het volgende geschreven: > >>> The package avahi does not exist, as SUMMARY said, we should > >>> use avahi-daemon to instead. It avoids the do_rootfs failure > >>> while IMAGE_INSTALL += "avahi" > >>> For compatibility, let avahi to provide avahi-daemon. > >> As stated before: > >> 1) Fix your IMAGE_INSTALL > > Could you describe what's wrong with IMAGE_INSTALL? > > I have no idea about it. Koen means that you should use IMAGE_INSTALL_append += "avahi-daemon" and not avahi... (I.e. package name, not recipe name). If you still insist on creating a package named avahi, you might as well create avahi as an empty package, RDEPEND'ing on all sub-packages. > >> 2) This breaks upgrade paths > >> Do you *really* want to break existing installs just so you can > >> pretend that your recipename==package name assumption isn't wrong? > > What does *upgrade paths* means? > Do you mean use package management to upgrade the > package, such as "smart upgrade". If yes, I think you are right, > we could drop patch 1/3 and 2/3. Yes, that's exactly what Koen talks about when it comes to ugrade paths. Cheers, Anders -- Anders Darander ChargeStorm AB / eStorm AB