Re: [PATCH] Revert "bitbake.conf: don't remove WARN_QA and ERROR_QA from hashes"

[Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1191 bytes --]

On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 12:21:23PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 6 February 2015 at 14:10, Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I think they should re-run. Otherwise we can end having errors and QA
> >> issues unnoticed until a full rebuild.
> >
> >
> > That was the state of things until my original patch last week.  The patch
> > had the side-effect that changing QA tasks causing *everything* to rebuild.
> > I'm really not sure that's a good solution.
> 
> If someone adds a QA tasks it is because it matters. In this case we
> ought to have it in an immediate effect so it does makes sense to
> rerun everything.
> 
> I know it is bad from build time point of view but predictability and
> correctness is more important from my point of view.

Agreed, especially when someone decides to make something fatal it
should highlight all failing recipes before it's enabled in "official"
build instead of sneaking the failures one-by-one as sstate is being
invalidated by other changes.

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]