From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB7C260034 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 11:20:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Apr 2015 04:19:42 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,503,1422950400"; d="scan'208";a="673715482" Received: from linux.intel.com ([10.23.219.25]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Apr 2015 04:19:42 -0700 Received: from linux.intel.com (vmed.fi.intel.com [10.237.72.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by linux.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE8206A408D; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 04:19:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 14:19:36 +0300 From: Ed Bartosh To: "Burton, Ross" Message-ID: <20150401111936.GA10151@linux.intel.com> References: <20150330224732.GA27217@linux.intel.com> <1427759396-24932-1-git-send-email-ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH] createrepo: Implement --dbpath command line option X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 11:20:04 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:25:11PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > Hi Ed, > > On 31 March 2015 at 00:49, Ed Bartosh wrote: > > > Upstream-Status: Pending > > > > The commit log needs just a Signed-off-by; the patch needs an explanation, > Signed-off-by, and Upstream-Status. The goal is that the patch itself is > self-explanatory, so should explain what it does and why, whether it went > upstream and why (not), and who admits creating it in the first place. > Thanks for the explanations. I'll update the patch. Regards, Ed