From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF3260167 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 14:14:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Apr 2015 07:14:18 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,623,1422950400"; d="scan'208";a="717483933" Received: from linux.intel.com ([10.23.219.25]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Apr 2015 07:14:19 -0700 Received: from linux.intel.com (vmed.fi.intel.com [10.237.72.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by linux.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D22286A408D; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 07:13:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:14:11 +0300 From: Ed Bartosh To: Adrian Freihofer Message-ID: <20150422141411.GA8275@linux.intel.com> References: <1429541663-5695-1-git-send-email-adrian.freihofer@gmail.com> <20150420182134.GA15567@linux.intel.com> <1429561646.14219.78.camel@gmail.com> <20150421101048.GA26939@linux.intel.com> <1429652884.1942.42.camel@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1429652884.1942.42.camel@gmail.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" Subject: Re: [master-next][PATCHv2] wic: Add plugin for single partition disk X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 14:14:19 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:48:04PM +0200, Adrian Freihofer wrote: > So far I did not recognize the MACHINE dependent behavior you mentioned > in your email. Thanks for the hint. May be wic has already a complexity > demanding for unit tests... > Be my guest :) http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-April/103590.html > Thanks for your support! I hope the updated patch fulfills the > requirements. I'll go and review it right away. Regards, Ed