From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.10]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B69F72491 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 21:08:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.nefkom.net (unknown [192.168.8.184]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3lbwZK1NNTz3hhj9; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 23:08:56 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: xwXl4uHf28KpN/7HX85Uq11rpF1owWcAw2bD9DknLQw= Received: from chi.localnet (unknown [195.140.253.167]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-auth.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3lbwZH0MMhzvdWV; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 23:08:54 +0200 (CEST) From: Marek Vasut To: Bruce Ashfield Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 22:06:57 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.13-trunk-amd64; KDE/4.13.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <1430239116-7671-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de> <553FD567.8010004@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <553FD567.8010004@windriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201504282206.57552.marex@denx.de> Cc: Paul Eggleton , Koen Kooi , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Add basic fitImage support X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 21:09:05 -0000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 08:45:59 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 2015-04-28 12:38 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > This series cleans up the code in kernel.bbclass and > > separates out the uImage generation. The 7th patch > > in this series then adds support for generation of the > > advanced successor of the uImage, the fitImage. > > > > This series adds only very rudimentary support for > > generation of fitImage. The advanced features might > > be added in subsequent patches. > > I read the series, and nothing fundamentally wrong jumps out. > Just one comment and one question from me. Wow, thanks! Best regards, Marek Vasut