From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com [209.85.212.174]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 162787626F for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 13:48:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wicgb10 with SMTP id gb10so157679130wic.1 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 06:48:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=0iMBMt4BNjYId/N86JCTlTUKDNZQFs5xSKMEsRdsVIQ=; b=Kvy/YT01I0XOacf6070iBbZpN/D2xZkwO9uulBM5tFjBhCJhidrlJqdmpHZiTcz2CK mgPKp8oYylP8Q3hDAiG8+ZLDb10t4uR1AS4RsBJh6f/+yqt+cV119srXnswuWvp6lprt h/6wKFp9NJZ83uJe8eif7icgB7J7zQzJQOl+iEo5cZFnf+o3BMKGcsLnLcw5HNeDaJlT JF5MqQY5Z7MDcq2at6vED/sXj6JDoLfvk+g476Q2NZKjJF9mR11IZ3c2CWAZfdJG16tP z3tU08JPhSFQRnqBLEQswXQUXV6MqXrmvySJK6lK1/Jd7ml+TBEOnLywsYv6TEDamVAg FbZQ== X-Received: by 10.194.88.69 with SMTP id be5mr65631409wjb.149.1438091302141; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 06:48:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ip-86-49-34-37.net.upcbroadband.cz. [86.49.34.37]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ib9sm33413833wjb.2.2015.07.28.06.48.21 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Jul 2015 06:48:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Martin Jansa X-Google-Original-From: Martin Jansa Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 15:48:25 +0200 To: "Burton, Ross" Message-ID: <20150728134825.GB2465@jama> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] file: 5.23 -> 5.24 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 13:48:24 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 68520 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="U+BazGySraz5kW0T" Content-Disposition: inline --U+BazGySraz5kW0T Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 02:08:20PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 28 July 2015 at 03:12, Robert Yang wrote: >=20 > > * Use git repo rather than tarball since the original SRC_URI is not > > stable, it is not reachable sometimes. > > >=20 > Personally speaking I see this as a recipe for a release of file which ju= st > happens to use git to fetch the tarball (and presumably that hash is the > 5.24 tag). In situations like this I prefer to see the recipe called > file_5.24.bb as there's no point having a giant PV including git SHAs when > it's just the release. until someone sets SRCREV_pn-file =3D "${AUTOREV}" somewhere and git SHAs in PV suddenly gets very useful. Personally speaking I prefer recipes with git SCM in SRC_URI named _git.bb and PV set to "A.B.C+gitr${SRCPV}". --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --U+BazGySraz5kW0T Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlW3iCgACgkQN1Ujt2V2gBwRGQCfaEP/cV4k3lhsCir51VVSyrS+ qSoAmwcWw0ozfqMwloDbzyprGJ4bmyOj =OV49 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --U+BazGySraz5kW0T--