From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from esa7.bmw.c3s2.iphmx.com (esa7.bmw.c3s2.iphmx.com [68.232.133.109]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76DD176B7C for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 10:39:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from esagw5.bmwgroup.com (HELO esagw5.muc) ([160.46.252.46]) by esa7.bmw.c3s2.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS; 08 Sep 2015 12:39:49 +0200 Received: from unknown (HELO esabb1.muc) ([160.50.100.31]) by esagw5.muc with ESMTP/TLS; 08 Sep 2015 12:39:49 +0200 Received: from smuch58b.muc (HELO SMUCH58B.europe.bmw.corp) ([160.46.137.108]) by esabb1.muc with ESMTP/TLS; 08 Sep 2015 12:39:47 +0200 Received: from SMUCM65A.europe.bmw.corp ([160.46.134.155]) by SMUCH58B.europe.bmw.corp ([160.46.137.108]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 12:39:47 +0200 From: To: Thread-Topic: [OE-core] Getting rid of "The license listed internal was not in the licenses collected" warnings? Thread-Index: AQHQtWFE4cV8Sr+dsEyawNT+O9yqyp4xH72AgAAcjwCAAE6QgIABDe4AgAAat4CAAAR6AA== Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 10:39:46 +0000 Message-ID: <20150908103552.GE8427@loska> References: <55963864.2030604@topic.nl> <55ED6393.6050906@topic.nl> <55EDBD6F.7090900@topic.nl> <55EEB647.7000101@topic.nl> In-Reply-To: <55EEB647.7000101@topic.nl> Accept-Language: en-US, de-DE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.44.101] MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: Getting rid of "The license listed internal was not in the licenses collected" warnings? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 10:39:50 -0000 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <692950C8924CB2409F119AC5B706EC27@bmwmail.corp> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 12:19:51PM +0200, Mike Looijmans wrote: > Ah, wait, on closer inspection it actually exists, but it's a symlink to > some none-existing location. Apparently, to save some diskspace and reduc= e > maintenance on text files I linked a few files together. Somehow, the lin= k > got copied instead of the file contents. > > I un-symlinked the "internal" file, and (together with some forced rebuil= ds) > that finally made the warning go away. Since I had similar stupid-user moments too, there is a generic function in sanity tests to check for broken symlinks. Would be great if you could add license files to this check. -Mikko=