From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com (mail-wi0-f176.google.com [209.85.212.176]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 087F765C8A for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 21:05:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so129614559wic.1 for ; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 14:05:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Cor20/MxvLVK/XaZP3cTjYYOyZIrg2cOQrVdnqcpf4o=; b=zIreMN/3fMXCL7VvxPLfMIG8QCXU2CcaK8DH3acBXq7If0bCXTWbUxivrqbiunGy+y sICA5xKPE4UMDvPit9KJPPAyLnX73hc2Pv7LgLEqsd0qgElkVX/1rDXK3kVHAtYlUw58 xUMNDIa2/Yc9oajqmogzCGRWA8Mnje+p52cBKfh6XkaJfSJqTqLNEFbrcMRvDjZUBiyr vVwBl3ISJiUWqsIgO97i2OsLEeOgs72RbwZP9N0p7iJfvvLs467zr9ZR8dzDD25Gudex SqV3lLsSBPZ5bNsKAj5uzD5FW/5GMwByoxEQKc2YkyMYHeknz6vlIlMO+dMT4bIQgIYb QU8w== X-Received: by 10.194.10.165 with SMTP id j5mr53192671wjb.147.1441746355741; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 14:05:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ip-86-49-34-37.net.upcbroadband.cz. [86.49.34.37]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bu19sm6709064wjb.45.2015.09.08.14.05.54 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 08 Sep 2015 14:05:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Martin Jansa X-Google-Original-From: Martin Jansa Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 23:06:42 +0200 To: Khem Raj Message-ID: <20150908210642.GG2381@jama> References: <8B394616-9009-4FF4-828C-561A859D34B3@gmail.com> <20150901215512.GE2458@jama> <255516EC-098E-457B-A2E6-2F7C953CAA8D@gmail.com> <1441177787.24871.33.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <55EF2670.6040101@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: Patch merge process X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 21:06:00 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 70845 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yQbNiKLmgenwUfTN" Content-Disposition: inline --yQbNiKLmgenwUfTN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 11:39:17AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Trevor Woerner wrot= e: > > If Richard doesn't want to use gerrit for OE-core, that doesn't exclude > > others from using it for the layers they manage, does it? >=20 > yes, however, we should prefer this to run on oe domain, its better > for project and then if most of layers use it its fine too, it could > end up > with same situation as patchwork where oe-core and bitbake do not use > it actively. other layers do. its not ideal situation but its ok as > long as > its makes people productive, we could be open for options its matter > of volunteers then maintaining the infra for these services. I agree, there are not technical reasons for not using it for other layers, but once we ask contributors to create account on gerrit and submit all patches through gerrit for *some* layers, then these people will ask why oe-core and bitbake submissions are different. I should also say that I really like gerrit work-flow and review, but if people continue to send patches to e-mail and someone else will need to add Change-Ids to them and consolidate them into review-chains, than it's not as great as it could be if all related people "buy-it" and use it exclusively. Regards, --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --yQbNiKLmgenwUfTN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlXvTeAACgkQN1Ujt2V2gByYBACeIWriGkTBwzSXfb1xEIu66HVt VhgAoIw+bHtH6n3r/bvGzqGfvr8GVtc+ =3ccc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yQbNiKLmgenwUfTN--