Re: [PATCH] meta-selftest: Add qemux86copy machine

[Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1789 bytes --]

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 04:59:47PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-09-30 at 16:28 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 02:47:13PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > I know Martin finds something like this useful for testing sstate signatures,
> > > this adds one to meta-selftest so we can use it from oe-selftest in the sstate
> > > tests there too.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/meta-selftest/conf/machine/qemux86copy.conf b/meta-selftest/conf/machine/qemux86copy.conf
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..bcce2f5
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/meta-selftest/conf/machine/qemux86copy.conf
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
> > > +require conf/machine/qemux86.conf
> > > +
> > > +MACHINEOVERRIDES .= ":qemux86"
> > 
> > I wasn't changing MACHINEOVERRIDES (in case this would hide some
> > possible sstate differences),
> 
> I think this actually makes it more likely to highlight differences, but
> either way, the tests I ran did highlight a raft of issues and it seems
> to be good enough to find several problems. I've sent enough fixes to
> make the new selftest pass.
> 
> >  instead I had to duplicate couple qemux86
> > overrides in linux-yocto, but this is still useful.
> > 
> > I'll drop my version after testing with sstate-diff-machines.sh that
> > both return the same results.
> 
> Sounds good.
> 
> FWIW you can run the new test with:
> 
> oe-selftest --run-tests sstatetests.SStateTests.test_sstate_sametune_samesigs
> 
> in case that isn't clear. It doesn't rely on building anything so is
> comparatively fast.

same as ssstate-diff-machines.sh --analyze :)

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]