Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@topic.nl>
Cc: OE-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: How to find out why my do_compile depends on $MACHINE
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 14:46:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151005124656.GA2388@jama> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <561263C5.2050606@topic.nl>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4201 bytes --]

On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 01:49:25PM +0200, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> On 05-10-15 12:18, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-10-05 at 11:34 +0200, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> >> I've been puzzling with this for many hours now, but I can't seem to figure
> >> this out.
> >>
> >> I have a recipe that doesn't mention MACHINE anywhere, but still the
> >> sstate-cache won't be re-used for other machines, because OE somehow insists
> >> the package does depend on $MACHINE.
> >>
> >> The workaround I could find is to put something like this in the recipe:
> >>
> >> MACHINE[vardepvalue] = "any"
> >>
> >> (Similar stupid hacks like "vardepsexclude" will probably work too, but I'm
> >> not interested in forcing this particular recipe, but I'm trying to figure out
> >> what makes bitbake think it matters)
> >>
> >> Since it builds for an FPGA type, the package has
> >> PACKAGE_ARCH="${FPGA_FAMILY}" set, and FGPA_FAMILY is set in local.conf.
> >>
> >>
> >> When switching machines, "bitbake -S printdiff fpga-image-dyplo-test" reports
> >> that MACHINE changed and that is what caused sstate not beign reused. But the
> >> recipe does not use anything related to $MACHINE at all.
> >>
> >> Is there a way to make it tell me WHY it thinks that MACHINE is important to
> >> the recipe?
> >
> > Very briefly (sorry travelling), find the task that you want to know
> > more around and find the sigdata file in the stamps directory for it.
> > Run "bitbake-diffsigs <sigdatafile>" and it will show you how the
> > dependencies are calculated. You can compare two sigdata files using the
> > same command, "bitbake-diffsigs <sigdatafile1> <sigdatafile2>".
> 
> Thanks, that reveiled the issue.
> 
> I was smart in local.conf and calculated the FPGA name from the MACHINE name. 
> That yields the same word, but somehow the dependency on the MACHINE variable 
> is kept.
> 
> A simple fix is then to just use a ":=" assignment for FPGA_FAMILY so that the 
> link to MACHINE is lost, but that then results in another rebuild:
> 
>    List of dependencies for variable FPGA_FAMILY changed from 
> 'set(['MACHINE'])' to 'set([])'
>    Dependency on Variable MACHINE was removed
> 
> 
> The FPGA packages take long to build (4 hours for just one is no exception, on 
> an i7 machine) so preventing them to be rebuilt is really important here.
> 
> But having found the issue, I guess after a round of rebuilds, it'll go away now.
> 
> 
> For the bigger picture:
> 
> If I have a recipe that says:
> 
> X = "x"
> 
> And I refactor it a bit to read:
> 
> Y = "x"
> X = "${Y}"
> 
> What is the logic behind having to rebuild the package now? Why does the 
> 'source' of the contents matter to the hash? It won't generate different 
> output, regardless whether X is 'calculated' or just 'constant'.

You can set vardepvalue flag like this:
X[vardepvalue] = "${X}"
if all you care is the value of X not the expression used to construct
it. This can help with your FGPA_FAMILY and is more readable (at least
to me) then immediate assignment.

This cannot be applied by default, because in some cases you have e.g.
TOPDIR variable used in value and then it's better to exclude just
TOPDIR from the variable dependencies and keep the rest of variables
tracked (using just the value would cause different signatures for 2
builds with different TOPDIR).

> In particular, I've noticed this happening when switching between AUTOREV and 
> a fixed revision in a recipe.
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Mike Looijmans
> System Expert
> 
> TOPIC Embedded Products
> Eindhovenseweg 32-C, NL-5683 KH Best
> Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best
> Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79
> Telefax: +31 (0) 499 33 69 70
> E-mail: mike.looijmans@topicproducts.com
> Website: www.topicproducts.com
> 
> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-05 12:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-05  9:34 How to find out why my do_compile depends on $MACHINE Mike Looijmans
2015-10-05 10:18 ` Richard Purdie
2015-10-05 11:49   ` Mike Looijmans
2015-10-05 12:46     ` Martin Jansa [this message]
2015-10-05 13:22     ` Richard Purdie
2015-10-06 12:55       ` Mike Looijmans
2015-10-06 15:40         ` Christopher Larson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151005124656.GA2388@jama \
    --to=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
    --cc=mike.looijmans@topic.nl \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox