From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com (mail-wm0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 892DD6FF25; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 14:04:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so28511826wme.0; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 06:04:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=joXF27UmVKSogYPV7ZRjzg4TDvOLYnTS358OyoKQ3IA=; b=qIDjTIsqQvzzHxn9KJ+1zVXII5+tmd86vgWpPlog6QxcVKP/onQgK2/RvFYp2YCkMe NrcZQBXOcV89ng376UiOCOIHlyKaILqr3EIWZ7UmHn9aWnzTNHrzd8jXjbdkAjrRX3VV 50xZoi1u/h5z4dDOi3jjXtmiIY7hcwxKcu0rsg3XhIhZfYGxAG07ddehFVtKQQhbvW68 N+5//xKPhLbnAlkA1+t0sf6nMDmrcgj5NV4kCB4gdImpyHizMa7m2nPhx8+aZurZOu9v 5cQ91jAd4Qm95lLQA2ZYNMHYKnTvQEqG6b7zWCVFPKWh831OfHOEOzI5WQIpCrAyhAvO NMKw== X-Received: by 10.28.136.149 with SMTP id k143mr12196713wmd.57.1449151473528; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 06:04:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (ip-86-49-34-37.net.upcbroadband.cz. [86.49.34.37]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id gl10sm7680872wjb.30.2015.12.03.06.04.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Dec 2015 06:04:32 -0800 (PST) From: Martin Jansa X-Google-Original-From: Martin Jansa Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 15:05:48 +0100 To: "Burton, Ross" Message-ID: <20151203140548.GA2244@jama> References: <41399562.aYmIK0zX5I@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> <20151201104720.GB2251@jama> <9135219.GRnf9JIkFP@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> <20151202081713.GA2248@jama> <20151202180440.GC2248@jama> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Cc: "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" , "Lespiau, Damien" , "openembedded-architecture@lists.openembedded.org" Subject: Re: [Openembedded-architecture] Patchwork & patch handling improvements X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 14:04:33 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 74315 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jRHKVT23PllUwdXP" Content-Disposition: inline --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 12:51:22PM +0000, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 3 December 2015 at 11:43, Barros Pena, Belen > wrote: >=20 > > >and more status values. > > > > You can add status values (to the db directly or via the Django admin > > interface), but they will apply to all projects in the Patchwork instan= ce. > > Ideally you should be able to set a list of status values per project I > > guess. > > >=20 > Well it depends on what the extra values are. Martin, what values do you > use? A "merged in staging" value would be useful for everyone. The list of bundles is in: http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Patchwork#Multiple_layers_sharing_the_same= _oe_project_on_patchwork Once the patches are added to correct bundles I mark them as archived to know which ones were sorted (the main page gets empty). Advantage of bundles (something similar can probably work with tags) is that the same patch can be in multiple bundles, e.g. I can include some change in master-next branch and bundle while also adding it to meta-networking bundle for Joe to merge it when ready. --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlZgTDsACgkQN1Ujt2V2gByr1ACgrEL6a9RadKu3n+F3QrKeqQdg iNcAoJjP3/Uh7rUnHVShMsL9Ppa+qDlV =tV2Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP--