From: Paul Barker <paul.barker@commagility.com>
To: <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] module.bbclass: Fix potential do_compile/do_make_scripts race condition
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 14:04:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151215140434.75233de0@centos-7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449401194-31567-1-git-send-email-paul.barker@commagility.com>
On Sun, 6 Dec 2015 11:26:33 +0000
Paul Barker <paul.barker@commagility.com> wrote:
> I ran into a race condition building multiple external modules against a 3.10.y
> series kernel using the dylan branch of OpenEmbedded. This is difficult to
> reproduce as it requires very specific timing: the do_make_scripts task for one
> module was linking the modpost script whilst the do_compile task for another
> module was attempting to use the modpost script. This resulted in a permission
> error:
>
> ERROR: Function failed: do_compile (see /home/COMMAGILITY/paul.barker/linux-bsp/work-1.0.1/ca-linux-bsp/build/tmp/work/amc_d24a4-oe-linux-gnueabi/ti-hplib-mod/01.01.00.04-r3d/temp/log.do_compile.25434 for further information)
> ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: /home/COMMAGILITY/paul.barker/linux-bsp/work-1.0.1/ca-linux-bsp/build/tmp/work/amc_d24a4-oe-linux-gnueabi/ti-hplib-mod/01.01.00.04-r3d/temp/log.do_compile.25434
> Log data follows:
> | DEBUG: Executing shell function do_compile
> | make -C /home/COMMAGILITY/paul.barker/linux-bsp/work-1.0.1/ca-linux-bsp/build/tmp/sysroots/amc-d24a4/usr/src/kernel M=$PWD clean
> | make[1]: Entering directory `/home/COMMAGILITY/paul.barker/linux-bsp/work-1.0.1/ca-linux-bsp/build/tmp/sysroots/amc-d24a4/usr/src/kernel'
> | make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/COMMAGILITY/paul.barker/linux-bsp/work-1.0.1/ca-linux-bsp/build/tmp/sysroots/amc-d24a4/usr/src/kernel'
> | make -C /home/COMMAGILITY/paul.barker/linux-bsp/work-1.0.1/ca-linux-bsp/build/tmp/sysroots/amc-d24a4/usr/src/kernel M=$PWD modules
> | make[1]: Entering directory `/home/COMMAGILITY/paul.barker/linux-bsp/work-1.0.1/ca-linux-bsp/build/tmp/sysroots/amc-d24a4/usr/src/kernel'
> | CC [M] /home/COMMAGILITY/paul.barker/linux-bsp/work-1.0.1/ca-linux-bsp/build/tmp/work/amc_d24a4-oe-linux-gnueabi/ti-hplib-mod/01.01.00.04-r3d/git/ti/runtime/hplib/module/hplibmod.o
> | Building modules, stage 2.
> | MODPOST 1 modules
> | /bin/sh: scripts/mod/modpost: Permission denied
> | make[2]: *** [__modpost] Error 126
> | make[1]: *** [modules] Error 2
> | make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/COMMAGILITY/paul.barker/linux-bsp/work-1.0.1/ca-linux-bsp/build/tmp/sysroots/amc-d24a4/usr/src/kernel'
> | make: *** [default] Error 2
> | ERROR: Function failed: do_compile (see /home/COMMAGILITY/paul.barker/linux-bsp/work-1.0.1/ca-linux-bsp/build/tmp/work/amc_d24a4-oe-linux-gnueabi/ti-hplib-mod/01.01.00.04-r3d/temp/log.do_compile.25434 for further information)
> ERROR: Task 1284 (/home/COMMAGILITY/paul.barker/linux-bsp/work-1.0.1/ca-linux-bsp/meta-mcsdk/meta-arago-extras/recipes-bsp/ti-hplib/ti-hplib-mod_git.bb, do_compile) failed with exit code '1'
>
> Later kernel versions do not rebuild the modpost script every time that 'make
> scripts' is invoked so they should be safe from this particular failure. However
> I'm not convinced that running 'make scripts' whilst also building an
> out-of-tree module is always safe on later kernels and there is always the
> potential for vendor kernels to have different behaviour here.
>
> Although this was seen on the dylan branch the behaviour of master and jethro
> looks to be the same here - do_make_scripts is locked so that only one instance
> of it may run at one time but there is nothing to prevent one instance of
> do_make_scripts running at the same time as an instance of do_compile.
>
> The patch I'm sending attempts to solve this issue by locking the do_compile
> task with the same lockfile as the do_make_scripts task in module.bbclass so
> that an instance of do_copile can't run at the same time as an instance of
> do_make_scripts. I don't know enough about the task locking to guarantee that
> this is the right solution or to be able to test that it works as expected so
> I'm marking the patch as an RFC.
>
> Please let me know if this is the right approach and if there is any easy way to
> test this.
>
> Paul Barker (1):
> module.bbclass: Fix potential do_compile/do_make_scripts race
> condition
>
> meta/classes/module.bbclass | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
ping on this.
I've just got bitten by this again so it's not a one-off. Is anyone able to
give me some feedback on the patch, whether this is the right approach to fix
the problem and whether this is applicable to jethro/master.
Thanks,
--
Paul Barker
CommAgility Ltd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-15 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-06 11:26 [PATCH RFC] module.bbclass: Fix potential do_compile/do_make_scripts race condition Paul Barker
2015-12-06 11:26 ` Paul Barker
2015-12-15 14:04 ` Paul Barker [this message]
2015-12-15 14:42 ` Bruce Ashfield
2017-05-08 10:29 ` Mike Crowe
2017-05-14 9:07 ` Mike Crowe
2018-03-28 8:24 ` Javier Viguera
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151215140434.75233de0@centos-7 \
--to=paul.barker@commagility.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox