From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vms173021pub.verizon.net (vms173021pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.21]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 924E877195 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 19:16:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([100.15.86.14]) by vms173021.mailsrvcs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.32.0 64bit (built Jul 16 2014)) with ESMTPSA id <0O1M00AQ3LJ2V2F0@vms173021.mailsrvcs.net> for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 13:16:19 -0600 (CST) X-CMAE-Score: 0 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=WpDWSorv c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=xDJgBcBrK5EN9DJ6g74wNQ==:117 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=7aQ_Q-yQQ-AA:10 a=0gcC27t9AAAA:8 a=70xRKmAa80XiIEj3_EEA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4F63D161E35; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:16:14 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:16:14 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: "Burton, Ross" Message-id: <20160127191614.GH1652@denix.org> References: <1453779264-8652-1-git-send-email-denis@denix.org> <20160126142023.GE1652@denix.org> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <20160126142023.GE1652@denix.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: OE-core , Denys Dmytriyenko Subject: Re: [PATCH] stress-ng: add 0.05.09 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 19:16:49 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 09:20:23AM -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:24:43AM +0000, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 26 January 2016 at 03:34, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > > > > A clean room re-implementation and extension of the original stress tool. > > > > > > > What's the rationale for adding this to oe-core over another layer? > > None, besides the original stress is in oe-core. What other layer would you > suggest? Ross, Care do make your own suggestion? Do you think meta-oe would be a better fit? Are there any other considerations, since stress-ng is a replacement of the original stress and it was added to oe-core? Thanks. -- Denys