From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ig0-f178.google.com (mail-ig0-f178.google.com [209.85.213.178]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07426607A4; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 00:22:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f178.google.com with SMTP id kc10so33208644igb.0; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:22:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=kBCZBcTB2tBK/uXCStzw9qbCqqv6qZB/+oPIxni0YaM=; b=Yx2IzA79kxeAtmIwQW0n60DEsHvh4det7hNNwuj6K3mIFLhmPRtztIvIzouxkO1JEn rbfFVbgqCkoMS4nvh7DQlDp9CZzefXem+fwvQhhrxvL8XxtF/32sNuqNPS7o3tXzs+ou /eygL7XssWu4uD7+HBlShcLogpu56MpEBZIv8iiF0qHC3JDTkHUx5hxvgxnl53lqSEk/ X42nkd+HqAEkFwrnIpaCWI0gvwvEu8Pof0ypTzJxZBQvAPNrLEtwdjGwBIdM8TlYyy5r L1mtN50I1ClNXBXCibGZVsI+x6FA2fDdi0tz061ICyU5Zp40Ha2o7Pas7WLHg/TJ5KXx xCxQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=kBCZBcTB2tBK/uXCStzw9qbCqqv6qZB/+oPIxni0YaM=; b=YWHp+Cc/VA/psZSgRHpRPuYrAJRUyAK1iLJ5JW7mscJXl5ZwehMqY0PaGlckewZhyP J/nXZV1ueRwztH/UtiSEuqWKdBE/xMUuRLhKbKwu0dMcv1ffIahK8fGoTWYr/+0+GwCQ XA0y81S64NNJ1axDo5KOQHliSM8uyB3yIgdwuT99H/KVukB4+/+lSy8N5NMlZxHOZusa OGkT4uhq/qNPtzeAZPNGLFdfBAhxXBopmCXuAYmSLe7paMfa8YAT2MroPraZqLSIAk5m K8Zoo/aiORPgvQ6JkV2YNVlDOjSEVXxm+KMgExsEH6xD1IK3eaZNdFYDUuAKtuettJ7p I78A== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIbe/ocBgPJTNFNopWxEZxUkFhD1rha7p4PT52fAdxLyOzGGeiJGXOk3kqlFnEpuA== X-Received: by 10.50.132.39 with SMTP id or7mr2099785igb.38.1458346974593; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:22:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux-yxv0 (dsl-67-55-28-109.acanac.net. [67.55.28.109]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 129sm6747177ion.0.2016.03.18.17.22.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:22:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:23:11 -0400 From: Trevor Woerner To: Martin Jansa , Paul Eggleton Message-ID: <20160319002311.GA1738@linux-yxv0> References: <20160317144357.GB2553@jama> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160317144357.GB2553@jama> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2016-03-16 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 00:22:54 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline On Thu 2016-03-17 @ 03:43:57 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > c278358 metadata-revs: provide more information I think the general consensus was to not accept patch c278358 since it affected the layout of a file that was expected to be processed by scripts. > e2bf30c buildhistory.bbclass: metadata-revs show repo parent But I *think* everyone was okay with this one?