From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f194.google.com (mail-io0-f194.google.com [209.85.223.194]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 051426E5CB; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 21:08:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f194.google.com with SMTP id p21so4626860ioe.1; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 14:08:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ibMmHd7kgOuxZVJWIFTuteNLPVmab18cGzetoiZ8I2c=; b=Jsn3rpVlpdtgas13pIPEOSsE8odQKDSkUEg/K+RTCuX2mFd8TchN2W6aNmWxPAFzTF s+Thw2d40syHdg+nki7TkcQA64vNcQ8oo+gWHVlKQBfecQ3X+6hXBWW+3+Bt0XpfD5MZ FAfoorwppQkJfDeAsYCDXm6daaoWDORwdvzgGWejz4wvnHYoa/CgQIDaY5SODRPWQYC6 8BVDDe3YBjrPWsu9o7fmJi24lIcbQ+FCuNUoNMjEpSdNRXntCDJLQXpoRFd6CoLrr8F/ eqAFbN1NOMNgRjlU1BLOSQBHyXLn0Kjd+KG0F85GFbz/8oY2x+kLTg9bTsXEnVQUumqy G0sw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ibMmHd7kgOuxZVJWIFTuteNLPVmab18cGzetoiZ8I2c=; b=Cmd7i4Si+i+155NpagQM0mMkFeSuUh/YLGQz67y9hSpEUtTHRwH+GpCk7GnlrZnNd/ LpVMbAjrkS3WUAXpARq9SxNy2k0y24phEtTCZP2SheLq7GsIa+o8/yankAapfYOmajiR 0kThzlKgDYJKf5fvk+mVLttbyPHUxpSOg3JZNCxtGhmwxs1tEDFB5dajEEjT3MPzljTi yj/isMrIsUWeHYv/Q/TCsecx3/aQR7Xjcy49lMS6qW9TZ+/ecom7Ox8XZKgtnOvE8jrw AlQqc6V/GEq77q0LwSZLNTHNxCvRKXjIEP+erfgyfQr4S+xvVrkthpL1LzQMgYYboMk5 OImg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLv0Sw2KpTOMI6LcK1n8psM8WnmkQ0ilWGeNRk3NpvHMk0jTEr251tFnSCIrf1ggg== X-Received: by 10.50.29.3 with SMTP id f3mr5935151igh.59.1458767330203; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 14:08:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux-yxv0 (dsl-67-55-28-109.acanac.net. [67.55.28.109]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p8sm9894659igi.2.2016.03.23.14.08.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Mar 2016 14:08:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:08:50 -0400 From: Trevor Woerner To: akuster808 , openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org, openembedded-core , Yocto Project , "openembedded-members@lists.openembedded.org" Message-ID: <20160323210850.GA5376@linux-yxv0> References: <56DEF97F.9070306@balister.org> <56F2C618.3050205@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56F2C618.3050205@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Subject: Re: [oe] OEDAM, April 8 in San Diego after ELC X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 21:08:50 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline On Wed 2016-03-23 @ 09:36:40 AM, akuster808 wrote: > There are only 10 people signed up. > Is that enough people to justify the expense room or even meet? I have no idea what the budget might be or what a room might cost. I'll leave it to those who do know to worry about the costs versus the benefits. In any case I certainly think it's still worth meeting. A smaller, more focused group can sometimes get more done than a larger group. Secondly, it's my experience that more people always show up than sign up. With a project like this there will always be things to discuss, and sometimes a discussion goes better in person rather than online. Best regards, Trevor