From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Greylist: delayed 3600 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at layers.openembedded.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 02:49:56 UTC Received: from vms173023pub.verizon.net (vms173023pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.23]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6202C731C8 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 02:49:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vz-proxy-l004.mx.aol.com ([64.236.82.152]) by vms173023.mailsrvcs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.32.0 64bit (built Jul 16 2014)) with ESMTPA id <0O5G00ERA52X7X70@vms173023.mailsrvcs.net> for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 20:49:46 -0500 (CDT) X-CMAE-Score: 0 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=J+9Xl1TS c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=a3t/a0oOYlYu/nGe1mf8ZA==:117 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=kziv93cY1bsA:10 a=pQ1NxvdBEWUWmppR-P0A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 Received: by 100.15.86.14 with SMTP id 3917d889; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 01:49:46 GMT Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 68CA9161F8A; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 21:49:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 21:49:45 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Robert Yang Message-id: <20160411014945.GL16135@denix.org> References: <20160410225130.GK16135@denix.org> <570AFBA4.40201@windriver.com> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <570AFBA4.40201@windriver.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] unique -dev package X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 02:49:57 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:19:32AM +0800, Robert Yang wrote: > On 04/11/2016 06:51 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > >On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 05:58:13AM -0700, Robert Yang wrote: > >>Hello, > >> > >>I think that one recipe should only have one -dev package, I'm not sure > >>whether this is right or not, please feel free to give your comments, we > > > >I know it is already 1 year since this change. But I can't seem to find any > >discussion or any explanation to why this change was required and what > >specific problem it was supposed to fix. Please point me to a clear reasoning > >of this change. Thanks. > > There is only one source package, so there should be only one pack of header > files, dev libs, and so on, and they should be placed in a uniq pkg. Since you are using "should" twice in the same sentence, can you please point me to a ratified RFC? -- Denys