From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Greylist: delayed 3600 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at layers.openembedded.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 21:16:24 UTC Received: from vms173009pub.verizon.net (vms173009pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.9]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7859760290 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 21:16:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vz-proxy-l002.mx.aol.com ([64.236.82.148]) by vms173009.mailsrvcs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.32.0 64bit (built Jul 16 2014)) with ESMTPA id <0O5N00ED94AXCL00@vms173009.mailsrvcs.net> for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 15:16:09 -0500 (CDT) X-CMAE-Score: 0 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=MtGvkDue c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=hkQRW7prCrFMEwk2DGUM9Q==:117 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=kziv93cY1bsA:10 a=0gcC27t9AAAA:8 a=aiIX5UjjAAAA:8 a=19YkIB3ywtWD6vDjjqoA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 Received: by 100.15.86.14 with SMTP id 3c898c7a; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 20:16:09 GMT Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E6253161FAE; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 16:16:08 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 16:16:08 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: "Burton, Ross" Message-id: <20160414201608.GF16135@denix.org> References: <1458850608-50481-1-git-send-email-kad@kad.name> <20160410184953.GH16135@denix.org> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: OE Core mailing list Subject: Re: [PATCH] image_types: use compress framework to produce checksums for images X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 21:16:25 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 08:53:29PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 10 April 2016 at 19:49, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > > BTW, at least for md5sum (not sure about sha*), isn't the de-facto standard > > extension .md5 and not .md5sum? Can we change it? > > Picking a random upstream (https://download.gnome.org/sources/glib/2.10/) > shows that GNOME used .md5sum until they migrated over to sha256sum, so I'm > not sure there's a de-facto standard as two equally reasonable options. Hmm, ok. I guess with the migration to sha256sum, it's becoming to provide multiple checksum files and I see more uses of .md5sum extension now. Never mind, I'll update my infrastructure from the old .md5 days... :) -- Denys