Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>
To: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: Package management DB in old-style SDK
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 21:01:27 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160419010127.GK16135@denix.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1968586.YaUkzg8nud@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com>

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:35:29AM +1200, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Hi Denys,
> 
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 18:14:55 Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> > I'm still using the old-style SDK (meta-toolchain) for our products due to
> > some code customizations in it and some of our use cases rely on the opkg
> > package management database being present in sysroots, so packages can be
> > manipulated in SDK with opkg command. It appears that /var/lib/opkg is now
> > empty and the package database is no longer supplied with the SDK.
> > 
> > I know about the new-style populate_sdk and the even newer Extensible SDK,
> > but not yet ready to convert our old use cases to that. Since there were
> > lots of changes around the way SDKs work in OE-Core in the past couple
> > releases, I'm failing to find the change that causes opkg DB to be missing
> > from the old style SDK. I'll appreciate any pointers in helping me debug
> > and/or fix this issue with my SDKs. Thanks.
> 
> As far as ipk is concerned I think it was this commit: 
> 
>   http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=c8e0ec2da9ad4ce1c103966906a85f68c15400dd
> 
> Unfortunately it wasn't made optional.

Thanks, Paul!

Unfortunately, the change is in the library, which is quite difficult to 
override in another layer...

Will there be any objections for making that change optional with the default 
being like it is now, but with the ability to restore the old way with a 
variable?

-- 
Denys


  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-19  1:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-18 22:14 Package management DB in old-style SDK Denys Dmytriyenko
2016-04-18 22:35 ` Paul Eggleton
2016-04-19  1:01   ` Denys Dmytriyenko [this message]
2016-04-19  1:38     ` Paul Eggleton
2016-04-19  2:19       ` Christopher Larson
2016-04-19  2:20         ` Christopher Larson
2016-04-22 18:07       ` Denys Dmytriyenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160419010127.GK16135@denix.org \
    --to=denis@denix.org \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox