Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sdk.py: preserve packaging data when SDKIMAGE_FEATURES has "package-management"
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 12:26:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160425162619.GU16135@denix.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461264262-31937-1-git-send-email-denis@denix.org>

Any comments?


On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 02:44:22PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> From: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@ti.com>
> 
> This is not enabled by default, as there are still limitations and possible
> issues with opkg (and rpm?) packaging data containing broken symlinks for
> local indexes:
> 
> http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=c8e0ec2da9ad4ce1c103966906a85f68c15400dd
> 
> There are other use cases for the packaging data to be available in SDK,
> since it provides comprehensive info about SDK's contents and in the case of
> opkg and dpkg is all text-based and can be easily parsed by simple scripts.
> 
> Introduce new "package-management" flag for SDKIMAGE_FEATURES list (similar
> to the one already used for IMAGE_FEATURES) that controls presence of the
> packaging data in resulting SDK, while unifying this behavior across the
> board for supported pkg managers - rpm, opkg, dpkg.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@ti.com>
> ---
>  meta/lib/oe/sdk.py | 18 ++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/sdk.py b/meta/lib/oe/sdk.py
> index f15fbdb..f1bbef6 100644
> --- a/meta/lib/oe/sdk.py
> +++ b/meta/lib/oe/sdk.py
> @@ -155,14 +155,16 @@ class RpmSdk(Sdk):
>  
>          execute_pre_post_process(self.d, self.d.getVar("POPULATE_SDK_POST_TARGET_COMMAND", True))
>  
> -        self.target_pm.remove_packaging_data()
> +        if not bb.utils.contains("SDKIMAGE_FEATURES", "package-management", True, False, self.d):
> +            self.target_pm.remove_packaging_data()
>  
>          bb.note("Installing NATIVESDK packages")
>          self._populate_sysroot(self.host_pm, self.host_manifest)
>  
>          execute_pre_post_process(self.d, self.d.getVar("POPULATE_SDK_POST_HOST_COMMAND", True))
>  
> -        self.host_pm.remove_packaging_data()
> +        if not bb.utils.contains("SDKIMAGE_FEATURES", "package-management", True, False, self.d):
> +            self.host_pm.remove_packaging_data()
>  
>          # Move host RPM library data
>          native_rpm_state_dir = os.path.join(self.sdk_output,
> @@ -232,14 +234,16 @@ class OpkgSdk(Sdk):
>  
>          execute_pre_post_process(self.d, self.d.getVar("POPULATE_SDK_POST_TARGET_COMMAND", True))
>  
> -        self.target_pm.remove_packaging_data()
> +        if not bb.utils.contains("SDKIMAGE_FEATURES", "package-management", True, False, self.d):
> +            self.target_pm.remove_packaging_data()
>  
>          bb.note("Installing NATIVESDK packages")
>          self._populate_sysroot(self.host_pm, self.host_manifest)
>  
>          execute_pre_post_process(self.d, self.d.getVar("POPULATE_SDK_POST_HOST_COMMAND", True))
>  
> -        self.host_pm.remove_packaging_data()
> +        if not bb.utils.contains("SDKIMAGE_FEATURES", "package-management", True, False, self.d):
> +            self.host_pm.remove_packaging_data()
>  
>          target_sysconfdir = os.path.join(self.sdk_target_sysroot, self.sysconfdir)
>          host_sysconfdir = os.path.join(self.sdk_host_sysroot, self.sysconfdir)
> @@ -314,6 +318,9 @@ class DpkgSdk(Sdk):
>  
>          self._copy_apt_dir_to(os.path.join(self.sdk_target_sysroot, "etc", "apt"))
>  
> +        if not bb.utils.contains("SDKIMAGE_FEATURES", "package-management", True, False, self.d):
> +            self.target_pm.remove_packaging_data()
> +
>          bb.note("Installing NATIVESDK packages")
>          self._populate_sysroot(self.host_pm, self.host_manifest)
>  
> @@ -322,6 +329,9 @@ class DpkgSdk(Sdk):
>          self._copy_apt_dir_to(os.path.join(self.sdk_output, self.sdk_native_path,
>                                             "etc", "apt"))
>  
> +        if not bb.utils.contains("SDKIMAGE_FEATURES", "package-management", True, False, self.d):
> +            self.host_pm.remove_packaging_data()
> +
>          native_dpkg_state_dir = os.path.join(self.sdk_output, self.sdk_native_path,
>                                               "var", "lib", "dpkg")
>          self.mkdirhier(native_dpkg_state_dir)
> -- 
> 2.2.0
> 
> -- 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


      reply	other threads:[~2016-04-25 16:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-21 18:44 [PATCH] sdk.py: preserve packaging data when SDKIMAGE_FEATURES has "package-management" Denys Dmytriyenko
2016-04-25 16:26 ` Denys Dmytriyenko [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160425162619.GU16135@denix.org \
    --to=denis@denix.org \
    --cc=denys@ti.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox