From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E02E60767 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 18:09:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hcb.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.41]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.15.2/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id u4NI99ga029599 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 23 May 2016 11:09:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yow-pgortmak-d1 (128.224.56.57) by ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Mon, 23 May 2016 11:09:09 -0700 Received: by yow-pgortmak-d1 (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1593E280127; Mon, 23 May 2016 14:09:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 14:09:09 -0400 From: Paul Gortmaker To: Olof Johansson Message-ID: <20160523180908.GE27984@windriver.com> References: <1463788963-31316-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <20160521101858.GP21318@axis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160521101858.GP21318@axis.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] coreutils: revert upstream commit causing havoc with ls output X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 18:09:18 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline [Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] coreutils: revert upstream commit causing havoc with ls output] On 21/05/2016 (Sat 12:18) Olof Johansson wrote: > On 16-05-20 20:02 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > Several large distros are voting with their feet and actively > > reverting the change, as per what can be seen above for Debian. > > To me, it sounds like you're saying that the Debian maintainer is > actively taking a stand against upstream, but the changelog makes > it sound more like a temporary thing. I did write "... it doesn't appear that the coreutils folks are going to change the default back to the old way..." > > From the changelog entry: > > * Disable default ls quoting for now to get the rest of 8.25 > > into testing. (Closes: #813164) > > Could you add something in the commit message to make this > clearer? I suppose I can resend with "..coreutils folks are _ever_ going to..." if you think that extra word clarifies things in the OE log I wrote. The log of the actual patch is as-is from Debian, aside from me adding the Upstream-Status, the http source and my SOB line. Is that the log you were hoping to have added to/clarified? Paul. -- > > -- > olofjn