From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f68.google.com (mail-it0-f68.google.com [209.85.214.68]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF326E667 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 13:52:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f68.google.com with SMTP id u186so13996057ita.1 for ; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 06:52:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Ye8AlGoBF48aHwmbVCAkXxSiUW/13QxnVfnL/RlrJ2s=; b=q4l7BOyu9hSeLA2jJDe43ixcwGtY+PDvbNiXW+EoxNhPnPZkjCxU+7qlQd/GJKtZFd 7JnPV9DuXsEUiXQ9800+hbJkhi+evdQrk+MU5Ng614IwasjQV3O7TU5T0uIpCA2DMS3G R5qucISknddYh1JIgHrhgRzbBSZomdCoECe+/OnCNLbf+9DwCeORNlQfTD7j5hzg9u9N RInPBajzW+M2djOaYsGh1ZdZYTERABUWZ29Yn2KV2IwEyQp6zj9xqKTB9AB2QPai+faM dfDecr0G1IAtgM2MqTabMCQ4zwovMk+oDrx2TD2GKHX2hZZJjmG6roRfiGmwzPwWABXg 9RKA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Ye8AlGoBF48aHwmbVCAkXxSiUW/13QxnVfnL/RlrJ2s=; b=Gbqa/sdwa68aDRkk9exm4uETCs+vjG5zgEEHn79WNN0y9w3AM773E+T0tGxUkAZES5 dxIuwm5NpqQqwaZuFRZ2EYKj3mpJIbZlN4cixO67RwG0EgnZ7mGGN2w/B+jwXobITvsa weqpjCMO6DtqazQjjjsSR6KM6biTiho/jm8+ZYTsU107yFzdGxJznhbCTHpgB4LK1UDU YQeakp2bKObcLkqKpPAwH1+Yewfhjo3P8uNRE4FlNGlXyng4hYEFqoOS6G/HAvfr0SK8 aVFfyWIx4oZdj6j/+wZfxAuSpDppxNm83OdIsT+ec83/NwtdA4cV0pE44aHY7XT2iIQ6 HIRw== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoous+eKeKsDJFFNOIuDGcByqnGpRDacshTeOUfB715uuI2w4PxECX0f9liGeLsv06BQ== X-Received: by 10.36.110.212 with SMTP id w203mr17935132itc.62.1470145953063; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 06:52:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from openSUSE-i7.site ([108.161.121.178]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 140sm10127006itl.4.2016.08.02.06.52.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Aug 2016 06:52:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 09:52:29 -0400 From: Trevor Woerner To: "Burton, Ross" Message-ID: <20160802135229.GA14681@openSUSE-i7.site> References: <20160801123253.9292-1-twoerner@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel.bbclass: add lzop dependency X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 13:52:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline On Mon 2016-08-01 @ 03:08:36 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 1 August 2016 at 15:07, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > > Not a large dependency, but it does bring to mind the question if this > > could be conditional on the type of image being built ? via distro > > feature, some other mechanism ? > > > > Exactly this: image building adds dependencies automatically based on what > is actually being used, so can the kernel do this too? I'm uncertain regarding the status of this patch: 1) will it be applied? (doesn't sound like it) 2) do you want me to work on it some more? (i'll look for other examples of conditional DEPENDS, i'm not aware of any off the top of my head) 3) should i be looking to push this into a BSP layer? (since BSPs usually choose their kernel)