From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com (sender163-mail.zoho.com [74.201.84.163]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2247C7318D for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2016 02:21:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (76-250-84-236.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [76.250.84.236]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1473906063736845.6003193286251; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 19:21:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 21:21:02 -0500 From: Patrick Williams To: Martin Jansa Message-ID: <20160915022102.GA25351@heinlein.lan> References: <20160914162519.16212-1-patrick@stwcx.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Zoho-Virus-Status: 1 Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH] e2fsprogs: configure with enable-symlink X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 02:21:07 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 87134 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ibTvN161/egqYuK8" Content-Disposition: inline --ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:23:47PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > It was also proposed and discussed some 15 months ago and it was packaging > issue not handling hardlinks correctly: > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-April/1039= 39.html >=20 > I believe this was fixed then, but maybe it got broken again? Sorry, this is my fault. I didn't think about hard-links. I was just skimming the cpio extract for parts that could be trimmed out and noticed it. $ ls -i *fsck* 19455718 e2fsck 19455671 fsck 19455718 fsck.ext2 19455718 fsck.ext3 19455718 fsck.ext4 19455718 fsck.ext4dev 19455679 fsck.minix 19455695 fsck.minix.util-linux 19455675 fsck.util-linux Is there a reason to prefer hardlinks over softlinks, for my own education? My desktop system used softlinks for fsck. --=20 Patrick Williams --ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJX2gWOAAoJEKsDR8wtAMEZhsMP/1oHb4T1OLHZkABs46TG+bv0 td5rKECb6D+mDPiniEB/USldydvG7XfYS8HuJzYxcwVGU4vjLJ8gRSVGL+uA2Alb XetWdmmOvRaPjNjbImFV/xzFBJbvp/WzuR8X9GWkaGGys+T6pPHez0JWyIlC9YD/ +Dnq5/9iGEyxaSipJz3PgQNK27YZNrEzrg6n0yFw/AZOdkkovfFEwKfgN/F8HTuH GdDmKRVF3v04FPGEQ5dqdWhJSbWKaDd6Fv5OncPNnDuWSTVsDRY+uNBBdQIBxPnV /ohHHnzk49Iag5ttsvMrttBKfJSjBd+TjLytc6J70sga87csnhYtvA7G06qNjF3c G785gjm/GcoqSc5wXhpehWWiKUugMpxSZJ8BIafrhXg5/gGVO3Qxlly3pnWXvjuZ HKrMKhoAQUYP3cQlewe0yuWFZPpFFl0zzdhpO11ZIIXqa/5sG6d0ukZwEbB4CmpJ 4sqDQyg77kqNduoUOUUucUuZs+DX0CyXl5+Xz+3d5vKkt3yrWpL3nsMp9EKPA71l BGNRD1zZwqW7IuVM3dWQdkOC8l/ITbsBboidLfjqQDWJZHO2Q/MbFHp4wyauheME yF+diqgdoimAodDRH4b3E1Ds0FZwl5UzFdAwaZZWV1+/r7ApekdU4XkfayqDcfr9 X8Rw6z6NErBMBDvg3dBS =ao9E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ibTvN161/egqYuK8--