From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5BDA6093E for ; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 10:42:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Oct 2016 03:42:03 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,289,1473145200"; d="scan'208";a="768322543" Received: from linux.intel.com ([10.54.29.200]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Oct 2016 03:42:03 -0700 Received: from linux.intel.com (vmed.fi.intel.com [10.237.72.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by linux.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4324B6A4080; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 03:41:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:31:08 +0300 From: Ed Bartosh To: Ulf Magnusson Message-ID: <20161003103108.GA5762@linux.intel.com> Reply-To: ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com References: <1475247756-32008-1-git-send-email-ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scripts: add new script 'native' X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 10:42:03 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 04:30:58PM +0200, Ulf Magnusson wrote: > On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Jérémy Rosen wrote: > > "native" might be a bit too generic... > > > > could I suggest oe_native-run or bitbake-native ? > > > > something that says it's yocto-galaxy specific and can be autocompleted with > > a reasonable prefix... > > > > > > Jérémy Rosen > > I think overly namespacing things that aren't likely to clash in > practice gets annoying. I would've gone for "run-native" (more > descriptive and English-like, less generic), but how about something > simple and easy to type like "oe-native" or "oe-run-native" if a > prefix is added? That's consistent with the naming scheme used for > many other scripts in scripts/ too. > I'm ok to rename it. I agree that 'native' may look too generic, but I don't know about any existing tool with this name. Anyway, let me know which name I should rename it to. Feel free to send a patch too. I personally like 'oe-native' more than other proposals. -- Regards, Ed