From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f68.google.com (mail-it0-f68.google.com [209.85.214.68]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4CC66060F; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 03:54:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f68.google.com with SMTP id o138so3774748ito.3; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 19:54:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=FBEUU87KvUmasYXLwuA0+0ujDrPovyFPWkzO0G6LgjI=; b=l8IbLb/VUogmPVR+p706fRp6b1z3hRMwAL3Qz5gY4swbxJrrV5+iW1RKii/J+yK0rd glS5C1nEZmi/feDi7YZ+fEwMxcKZOQYG9rPFA2ReV80J6B0taCCzusEdc5MHa35eN3Jw zskYqQbsPrBqvmxIlvD3+Zf9lVvBg1w5QxS+JgsFsXvqeQEvWs1+CRhspPGVslB4iKYZ TRjvSeSMprp4lQFzuiIkSzK5EcvXCsGZTcr628QH3zsTR5YkiFpqeB5hek0CvNKWH66E s/YfF4zknCPHNjpzOXj5Mcf6G263yzCLlDaRihDVCOX4V3vZztbor4QUx9fTOb9WrPNy mQEA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=FBEUU87KvUmasYXLwuA0+0ujDrPovyFPWkzO0G6LgjI=; b=rRG8bj4Wvj8XLnnSwRBDpa4MGRHuTXsVguE9dvCld+wdPcM0NuEcc3VPiBg5frwFvg Y5MNhVeH1TcSrHXjYhZwhGLj+a9KD8+b0t065oahk25WViK51qM6dBtfStZz5IeWX8G0 htCeJP9yiNYLvlcXgH++vKxCK3ReJe2x7hDdUsSS64SWKHoe8c8njT6dmCzWUA9eH76O 19FMtfZ/XZh+osoLBMgg2nQyy4KMvUpaCo6bTynPr+quz0FAQLTMzKLKNxMGpu4w/GBL qbZnMk8Aa34YtVfRDEbxvRZAAnAVfZLVh9lcN4wUmkrIYotsJGl48xr9eBizjdu2wrf/ HVXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLb/lby/6kcJGxLbpIFLC3nSOrW7kBVZ47/ChI8VVS2Np6AbWPbBDaYr23s6Fq18Q== X-Received: by 10.36.225.195 with SMTP id n186mr28036829ith.35.1484798073442; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 19:54:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from linux-uys3 (dsl-67-55-28-109.acanac.net. [67.55.28.109]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a99sm2197097ioj.7.2017.01.18.19.54.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Jan 2017 19:54:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 22:54:30 -0500 From: Trevor Woerner To: Paul Eggleton Message-ID: <20170119035430.GA24183@linux-uys3> References: <2683342.SVnRAGIE1W@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2683342.SVnRAGIE1W@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, openembedded-architecture@lists.openembedded.org, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: Patchwork and incoming patch testing X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 03:54:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline On Wed 2017-01-18 @ 07:05:58 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > This should give us a bit more visibility into > where patches are at in the process, although we are still working on a few > places where patch series status needs to be updated (e.g. when a patch goes > into testing). Is the testing process for OE patches formalized? I'm not referring to the Yocto Project's release testing.