From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C02600E3 for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 17:01:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Feb 2017 09:01:24 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,342,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="40483706" Received: from linux.intel.com ([10.54.29.200]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Feb 2017 09:01:23 -0800 Received: from linux.intel.com (vmed.fi.intel.com [10.237.72.38]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by linux.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F092E6A4080; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 09:00:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 18:38:57 +0200 From: Ed Bartosh To: Kristian Amlie Message-ID: <20170206163857.GA17774@linux.intel.com> Reply-To: ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com References: <1486397807-11699-1-git-send-email-kristian.amlie@mender.io> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1486397807-11699-1-git-send-email-kristian.amlie@mender.io> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] selftest/wic: Add tests for --exclude-dir option. X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 17:01:30 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 05:16:45PM +0100, Kristian Amlie wrote: > > Rebased and reran tests. Changes since last patchset: > > - Because of recipe specific sysroots we now need to import the PATH > used by wic-tools into the test in order to use its tools. > > - Add specific '-o' parameter while testing wic so that we write into > resultdir. > > - Several unrelated changes to poky now means that we need to use an > absolute path for new_rootfs in the rootfs.py implementation. This > would have been a good idea from the start anyway. > > I hope there are no more outstanding issues with this patchset. > The patchset looks good to me. All wic test cases have been passed. -- Regards, Ed