From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com>
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93])
	by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC09730A4
	for <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>;
	Mon,  6 Mar 2017 18:04:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23])
	by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384;
	06 Mar 2017 10:03:49 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,254,1484035200"; d="scan'208";a="1119129469"
Received: from linux.intel.com ([10.54.29.200])
	by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Mar 2017 10:03:49 -0800
Received: from linux.intel.com (vmed.fi.intel.com [10.237.72.38])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by linux.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A29586A4080;
	Mon,  6 Mar 2017 10:03:45 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 19:50:10 +0200
From: Ed Bartosh <ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com>
To: "Burton, Ross" <ross.burton@intel.com>
Message-ID: <20170306175010.GA18369@linux.intel.com>
Reply-To: ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com
References: <CAJTo0LaafDCfjH_cCHJDx0BCeZxVi7DPv3Cw_QdXvqYD+ehseA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1488814260-8668-1-git-send-email-ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com>
	<CAJTo0LY7pOtUWsbCJQ8_4A=Bxws04Sdfr1M-59fa6K5gdqJk-Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJTo0LY7pOtUWsbCJQ8_4A=Bxws04Sdfr1M-59fa6K5gdqJk-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: OE-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sstate.bbclass: update .siginfo atime
X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/options/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 18:04:01 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:49:25PM +0000, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 6 March 2017 at 15:31, Ed Bartosh <ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > +       [ -h ${SSTATE_PKG}.siginfo ] && touch -a ${SSTATE_PKG}.siginfo
> >
> 
> $ ( [ -h / ] && echo something ); echo $?
> 1
> 
> If the -h fails then this is still going to cause sstate_unpack_package to
> trap.

I don't think it will as '&&' and '||' lists are among other special cases where
shell doesn't exits on error.

Here is a proof:

$ cat test.sh

set -e

trap 'ouch!' ERR

foo() {
    [ -h /etc/fstab ] && echo 'fstab is a symlink'
    echo 'end of foo'
}

foo
echo $?

$ $ sh -e test.sh
end of foo
0


--
Regards,
Ed