From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f193.google.com (mail-pf0-f193.google.com [209.85.192.193]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95473775E8; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 02:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf0-f193.google.com with SMTP id 67so2011220pfg.2; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 18:34:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=J/+ljbFNwjr0AtDxjNVmIPlJ2qwrkJouIi3A5w5zZH0=; b=W+pwhO8+THE4P5erZXDDeSmTeRRVLCFxUABEhDqk2Ln9R8sKWgTAk8YByj2mqcq2c1 R1oBS4LLEirTqYl3lmVknyugoMS7arKOewlyqMZ3hLNYe94bKXVXP2/BtrdbXoUHc6Bo iFAEwRocgNRbeR2RyyNvIkDwD9RM5/x8vXjEYcV0YkyBNmHu0YOpJlkFhDagO0PPMtpE Ub1GQNshUsimn3v0KS4e6UN325MYoanzw5KxeV88oQa4a9MvE3B02JujMxa9mTs/BZv5 OPHyrYGkpHVphC50vCCYIopCI2cyMkREu0JinESLdHXATERm0lNLvLIK6O9/VO9C+Lk+ P96Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=J/+ljbFNwjr0AtDxjNVmIPlJ2qwrkJouIi3A5w5zZH0=; b=V77bgVFxBOhxwCgfJ9JmKleYtPFTcyWP1020wfJLvWKN69oBPnAkWlkp+7DOgpZrQ6 bnS99EwOqzj1NrTc0oaf5LLeOXu6QxHI6QIBn9+MqwnBbMge8VA1iiZkTxLwzHlTmsZa 6rE8z2ZBnmif2FyKpfZ/X9XDR9M03lu4LnKATIKmsy/bCJS/2jFsP2j1a73YtTteM6oT P+eB/5CDPOOF4IPJtMCpCdGOpciFCtwV0XmEPr+w8qLC9tj54+/ujpQzDg6Dcg18DW2F FhDkFUk8nPBOJqOoIkeaWQJBlWi/c2a6oc78bp+a9YRUx5D8XFXf+pcRtOeQhYXToNuL 21wA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39navofbEuWOZuUyhgBDYtW3EP5vSlnrDbDIZ30UlGV7p77pcyaTvV1nYA0ci85x7w== X-Received: by 10.84.248.4 with SMTP id p4mr5058910pll.72.1488940488684; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 18:34:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from haswell (c-76-102-32-192.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [76.102.32.192]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s26sm2203107pge.33.2017.03.07.18.34.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Mar 2017 18:34:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 18:34:42 -0800 From: Khem Raj To: "Burton, Ross" Message-ID: <20170308023441.GA28127@haswell> References: <1488862727-25152-1-git-send-email-armccurdy@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Cc: openembedded-architecture , OE-core Subject: Re: [Openembedded-architecture] [PATCH] meta: start to ignore the largefile distro feature X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 02:34:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline On 17-03-07 10:35:58, Burton, Ross wrote: > CCing openembedded-architecture to open the field for comments. > > On 7 March 2017 at 04:58, Andre McCurdy wrote: > > > The largefile distro feature has been enabled by default in oe-core > > for a long time and, more recently, also in poky-tiny. Building > > without the largefile distro feature receives little or no testing. > > Many packages now enable LFS without exposing a configure option, so > > there should be very little expectation that disabling the distro > > feature will result in a distro which globally disables LFS. > > > > So I've had a bug for this for some time but have never got around to it. > > If we're going to assert "LFS by default" do we want a sanity check to > verify it was used? > > Do we want to put -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 in the default > CFLAGS? I think this is fine to assert, however, there might be applications which still want to use --enable/--disable autoconf stuff, and ignore/override the env settings we might pass, so we need to watch out for those. Otherwise, this seems a step in right direction. > > I'm not aware of any good reason to not use LFS, but now is the time for > anyone else to speak up if you have a good reason to keep it as an option! me neither, we should just make it default settings. > > Ross > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-architecture mailing list > Openembedded-architecture@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-architecture