From: Ed Bartosh <ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com>
To: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
Cc: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: Create more than one image with WIC
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 20:06:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170314180644.GA22000@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1489513785.6396.83.camel@intel.com>
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 06:49:45PM +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
>
> > It's not a big deal to run wic sequentially to produce multiple images,
> > but it will create more problems than it solves I believe. It will be slower and
> > will make a mess in image naming in deploy directory.
>
> I personally would prefer to support generating more than one wic image
> per image recipe. The different output files could be distinguished with
> an additional suffix (".efi.wic", ".live.wiC", etc.) where the suffix is
> either specified by the WKS file or the configuration where the WKS file
> is selected - the latter might be a bit more flexible.
>
From my point of view ths would be against the current design of oe
image building susbsystem. It would be also more complex and slower
unless we'll find a way to dynamically generate multiple image creation
tasks per one recipe and run them in parallel. In this case it will be
even more complex.
--
Regards,
Ed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-14 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-08 9:44 Create more than one image with WIC Daniel Schultz
2017-03-08 10:57 ` Ed Bartosh
2017-03-08 13:41 ` Gary Thomas
2017-03-08 13:43 ` Ed Bartosh
2017-03-13 16:16 ` Daniel Schultz
2017-03-14 17:11 ` Ed Bartosh
2017-03-14 17:49 ` Patrick Ohly
2017-03-14 18:06 ` Ed Bartosh [this message]
2017-03-15 7:24 ` Patrick Ohly
2017-03-15 12:58 ` Ed Bartosh
2017-03-15 13:39 ` Patrick Ohly
2017-03-15 13:41 ` Patrick Ohly
2017-03-15 14:01 ` Ed Bartosh
2017-03-15 14:47 ` Ed Bartosh
2017-03-15 15:09 ` Patrick Ohly
2017-03-15 15:04 ` Patrick Ohly
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170314180644.GA22000@linux.intel.com \
--to=ed.bartosh@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gary@mlbassoc.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=patrick.ohly@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox