From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] autoconf-archive: move from meta-oe to OE-core
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 01:56:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170810235637.GA3320@jama> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <04c5a375-93ee-7f32-4f91-a4dc3f7c9b1c@windriver.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6541 bytes --]
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 03:34:48PM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 8/10/17 3:18 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > -2
>
> I agree that autoconf-archive should be in oe-core. But...
No argument about that, it was already merged to oe-core, I was only
commenting about the gnome-common change included in this commit.
>
> > LBTM
> >
> >
> > If gnome-common should depend on TUNE_PKGARCH autoconf-archive, then it cannot inherit allarch anymore, see:
> >
> >
> > ERROR: gnome-common different signature for task do_package_write_ipk.sigdata between qemux86copy and qemuarm
> > runtaskdeps changed:
> > autoconf-archive/autoconf-archive_2016.09.16.bb.do_packagedata with hash e26a8076711b7e88a3ffcda74a9e5332
> > changed to
> > autoconf-archive/autoconf-archive_2016.09.16.bb.do_packagedata with hash ee3f5138593bed3feb8519cf3c26aa7b
> > Hash for dependent task autoconf-archive/autoconf-archive_2016.09.16.bb.do_packagedata changed from e26a8076711b7e88a3ffcda74a9e5332 to ee3f5138593bed3feb8519cf3c26aa7b
> >
>
> There should not be an architectural difference. There is no reason it
> shouldn't be allarch. Part of the reason we really need to move it into oe-core
> is that currently different BSPs may implement it differently making the
> 'allarch' even MORE complicated.
I don't understand what you mean with BSPs wrt autoconf-archive, but as
it is now, the autoconf-archive in oe-core isn't allarch, so allarch
gnome-common in meta-oe cannot depend on it.
It could be whitelisted in layer.conf or allarch can be dropped from
gnome-common or autoconf-archive can be updated to inherit allarch as
well - either of these options is fine with me, but I won't merge this
change in current state.
>
> --Mark
>
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 6:45 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com
> > <mailto:raj.khem@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com
> > <mailto:patrick.ohly@intel.com>> wrote:
> > > Having common macros in OE-core that are needed by autotools based
> > > projects makes sense. For example, tpm2.0-tools in meta-measured
> > > depended on meta-oe only because of autoconf-archive.
> > >
> > > This is a verbatim copy of the autoconf-archive recipe in
> > > meta-openembedded rev 1cbd1bc1, with just one change: the patch which
> > > disabled the installation of ax_code_coverage.m4 and
> > > ax_check_enable_debug.m4 was removed.
> > >
> > > So now autoconf-archive in OE-core provides them. gnome-common in
> > > meta-oe will be changed to not install them and instead depend on
> > > autoconf-archive.
> >
> > +1
> > LGTM
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com
> > <mailto:patrick.ohly@intel.com>>
> > > ---
> > > meta/recipes-devtools/autoconf-archive/autoconf-archive.inc |
> > 15 +++++++++++++++
> > > meta/recipes-devtools/autoconf-archive/autoconf-archive_2016.09.16.bb
> > <http://autoconf-archive_2016.09.16.bb> | 13 +++++++++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644
> > meta/recipes-devtools/autoconf-archive/autoconf-archive.inc
> > > create mode 100644
> > meta/recipes-devtools/autoconf-archive/autoconf-archive_2016.09.16.bb
> > <http://autoconf-archive_2016.09.16.bb>
> > >
> > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/autoconf-archive/autoconf-archive.inc
> > b/meta/recipes-devtools/autoconf-archive/autoconf-archive.inc
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..9684d1f
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/autoconf-archive/autoconf-archive.inc
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> > > +LICENSE = "GPLv3"
> > > +HOMEPAGE = "http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf-archive/
> > <http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf-archive/>"
> > > +SECTION = "devel"
> > > +
> > > +DEPENDS += "m4-native"
> > > +DEPENDS_class-native = "m4-native gnu-config-native"
> > > +DEPENDS_class-nativesdk = "m4-nativesdk gnu-config-nativesdk"
> > > +
> > > +RDEPENDS_${PN} = "m4 gnu-config gnome-common"
> > > +RDEPENDS_${PN}_class-native = "m4-native gnu-config-native"
> > > +RDEPENDS_${PN}_class-nativesdk = "m4-nativesdk gnu-config-nativesdk"
> > > +
> > > +SRC_URI = "${GNU_MIRROR}/${BPN}/${BPN}-${PV}.tar.xz"
> > > +
> > > +inherit autotools
> > > diff --git
> > a/meta/recipes-devtools/autoconf-archive/autoconf-archive_2016.09.16.bb
> > <http://autoconf-archive_2016.09.16.bb>
> > b/meta/recipes-devtools/autoconf-archive/autoconf-archive_2016.09.16.bb
> > <http://autoconf-archive_2016.09.16.bb>
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..0a1a771
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++
> > b/meta/recipes-devtools/autoconf-archive/autoconf-archive_2016.09.16.bb
> > <http://autoconf-archive_2016.09.16.bb>
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> > > +require autoconf-archive.inc
> > > +
> > > +
> > > +PARALLEL_MAKE = ""
> > > +
> > > +LICENSE = "GPLv2 & GPLv3"
> > > +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=d32239bcb673463ab874e80d47fae504"
> > > +
> > > +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "bf19d4cddce260b3c3e1d51d42509071"
> > > +SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
> > "e8f2efd235f842bad2f6938bf4a72240a5e5fcd248e8444335e63beb60fabd82"
> > > +
> > > +EXTRA_OECONF += "ac_cv_path_M4=m4"
> > > +BBCLASSEXTEND = "native nativesdk"
> > >
> > > base-commit: d3a41fbd94462efc8c6f1b55f6fb54001b447c45
> > > --
> > > git-series 0.9.1
> > > --
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Openembedded-core mailing list
> > > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> > <mailto:Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
> > > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
> > <http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core>
> > --
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openembedded-core mailing list
> > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> > <mailto:Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
> > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
> > <http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 201 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-10 23:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-28 14:01 [PATCH] autoconf-archive: move from meta-oe to OE-core Patrick Ohly
2017-07-28 16:45 ` Khem Raj
2017-08-10 20:18 ` Martin Jansa
2017-08-10 20:34 ` Mark Hatle
2017-08-10 23:56 ` Martin Jansa [this message]
2017-08-11 1:53 ` Mark Hatle
2017-08-24 7:47 ` Patrick Ohly
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170810235637.GA3320@jama \
--to=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox