From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: openssl10 unusable for many components
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 19:41:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170818174114.GA3298@jama> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d2851cd0-1a15-f5aa-1e9b-dda654978178@linux.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1611 bytes --]
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 02:54:37PM +0300, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> On 08/17/2017 02:46 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > I meant "real-world" as builds for any products on the market (which are
> > likely using one of the failing recipes) - e.g. in LGE we have many more
> > failures over all internal components, so I'll just undo this openssl
> > switch (renaming openssl_1.1 as openssl11 and openssl11_1.0 back as
> > openssl_1.0 with PROVIDES openssl11). We won't be able to use
> > openssl-1.1 for long time anyway, because there are some 3rd party
> > component which are difficult (or expensive) to get rebuilt against new
> > openssl ABI, but we might be interested in some other improvements in
> > oe-core/master.
>
> Yes, this will work for you as a quick fix, but it is merely postponing
> dealing with the issue properly to a later date. Make a plan for it and
> keep in mind that openssl 1.0 goes out of upstream support at the end of
> 2019. Given its history of major security vulnerabilities, it will be
> removed from oe-core well before that time, so that it won't linger in
> supported YP releases.
openssl 1.1 goes out of upstream support on 2018-08-31 _more than a year
before_ 1.0.2 support, see:
https://www.openssl.org/policies/releasestrat.html
Version 1.1.0 will be supported until 2018-08-31.
Version 1.0.2 will be supported until 2019-12-31 (LTS).
Given its history of major security vulnerabilities, I hope you'll
remove openssl-1.1.0 even sooner than openssl-1.0.2.
Regards,
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 201 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-18 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-17 10:31 openssl10 unusable for many components Martin Jansa
2017-08-17 11:23 ` Alexander Kanavin
2017-08-17 11:33 ` Richard Purdie
2017-08-17 11:46 ` Martin Jansa
2017-08-17 11:54 ` Alexander Kanavin
2017-08-18 5:56 ` Khem Raj
2017-08-18 10:53 ` Alexander Kanavin
2017-08-18 14:41 ` Khem Raj
2017-08-18 17:29 ` Martin Jansa
2017-08-18 17:56 ` Mark Hatle
2017-08-18 18:41 ` Alexander Kanavin
2017-08-18 18:55 ` Martin Jansa
2017-08-18 19:03 ` Mark Hatle
2017-08-18 18:19 ` Alexander Kanavin
2017-08-21 9:29 ` Richard Purdie
2017-08-21 9:59 ` Martin Jansa
2017-08-18 18:15 ` Alexander Kanavin
2017-08-18 17:41 ` Martin Jansa [this message]
2017-08-18 18:30 ` Alexander Kanavin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170818174114.GA3298@jama \
--to=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox