From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.seebs.net (mail.seebs.net [162.221.74.143]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A9A78062 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 23:18:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seebsdell (unknown [24.196.59.174]) by mail.seebs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2F45E2ADC93; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 18:18:49 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 18:18:47 -0500 From: Seebs To: Trevor Woerner Message-ID: <20170918181847.594b6943@seebsdell> In-Reply-To: References: <20170918133410.31388-1-alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] pseudo: use epoll API on Linux X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 23:18:48 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 19:16:13 -0400 Trevor Woerner wrote: > It doesn't make sense to carry these large patches against pseudo in > OE itself. Isn't pseudo one of the tools under The Yocto Project > umbrella? Yes. But the pool of people with the variety of expertise needed to maintain it isn't huge, and *normally* I'm more responsive, I'm just extra busy the last couple of months. -s