From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAAAC60102 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 21:35:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Oct 2017 14:35:16 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,482,1500966000"; d="scan'208";a="159378413" Received: from lsandov1-mobl2.zpn.intel.com ([10.219.128.134]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with SMTP; 05 Oct 2017 14:35:16 -0700 Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 16:44:47 -0500 From: Leonardo Sandoval To: Leonardo Sandoval Message-Id: <20171005164447.48dc7a86bd86519f67a3a41a@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20171005101918.282f15658ac2a600e3c4c251@linux.intel.com> References: <8b6c437e-c5b6-d242-5e1c-b19406153c76@topic.nl> <20171005101918.282f15658ac2a600e3c4c251@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Mike Looijmans , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: Recipe versions and layer confusion X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 21:35:15 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:19:18 -0500 Leonardo Sandoval wrote: > On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 16:49:28 +0200 > Mike Looijmans wrote: > > > I'm confused. > > > > Layer "meta-xilinx" defines: > > > > recipes-bsp/arm-trusted-firmware/arm-trusted-firmware_2017.1.bb > > > > This recipe is too old for my liking, so I made a newer one in "meta-topic" > > > > recipes-bsp/arm-trusted-firmware/arm-trusted-firmware_2017.3.bb > > > > > > Much to my surprise, when I build, OE picks the 2017.1 version and not the > > 2017.3 version. > > > > bitbake-layers show-layers reveils: > > .. > > meta-xilinx /home/mike/projects/zynq-platform/meta-xilinx 5 > > meta-topic /home/mike/projects/zynq-platform/meta-topic 6 > > .. > > > > so that means that my meta-topic should win even if my PV were lower, right? > > "For example, a layer that has a recipe with a higher PV value but for which the BBFILE_PRIORITY is set to have a lower precedence still has a lower precedence." My bad. topic has higher priority than xilinx, so there is something wrong as you mentioned. Leo > > taken from > > http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.3.2/mega-manual/mega-manual.html#var-BBFILE_PRIORITY > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Mike Looijmans > > System Expert > > > > TOPIC Products > > Materiaalweg 4, NL-5681 RJ Best > > Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best > > Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79 > > E-mail: mike.looijmans@topicproducts.com > > Website: www.topicproducts.com > > > > Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail > > > > > > Visit us at the Space Tech Expo Europe (Stand E-71) > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > > Openembedded-core mailing list > > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > > > -- > Leonardo Sandoval > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- Leonardo Sandoval