From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from do.openembedded.org (do.openembedded.org [107.170.225.144]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE2B7886F; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 22:53:18 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Patchwork To: Stefan Agner Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 22:53:20 -0000 Message-ID: <20171117225320.2784.57738@do.openembedded.org> References: <20171117175142.2642-1-stefan@agner.ch> Reply-To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore In-Reply-To: <20171117175142.2642-1-stefan@agner.ch> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?4pyXIHBhdGNodGVzdDogZmFpbHVyZSBmb3IgIltyb2Nrb10gb3BlbnNzbDEwOiBVcGdyYWRlIDEuMC4uLiIgYW5kIDMgbW9yZQ==?= X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 22:53:18 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit == Series Details == Series: "[rocko] openssl10: Upgrade 1.0..." and 3 more Revision: 1 URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/9855/ State : failure == Summary == Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the proposed series by patchtest resulting in the following failures: * Issue Series does not apply on top of target branch [test_series_merge_on_head] Suggested fix Rebase your series on top of targeted branch Targeted branch master (currently at a17f3ec910) * Patch [rocko,1/4] openssl10: Upgrade 1.0.2l -> 1.0.2m Issue Missing or incorrectly formatted CVE tag in included patch file [test_cve_tag_format] Suggested fix Correct or include the CVE tag on cve patch with format: "CVE: CVE-YYYY-XXXX" * Issue A patch file has been added, but does not have a Signed-off-by tag [test_signed_off_by_presence] Suggested fix Sign off the added patch file (meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl-1.0.2m/0001-aes-armv4-bsaes-armv7-sha256-armv4-.pl-make-it-work-.patch) * Issue Added patch file is missing Upstream-Status in the header [test_upstream_status_presence_format] Suggested fix Add Upstream-Status: to the header of meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/0001-aes-asm-aes-armv4-bsaes-armv7-.pl-make-it-work-with-.patch Standard format Upstream-Status: Valid status Pending, Accepted, Backport, Denied, Inappropriate [reason], Submitted [where] If you believe any of these test results are incorrect, please reply to the mailing list (openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org) raising your concerns. Otherwise we would appreciate you correcting the issues and submitting a new version of the patchset if applicable. Please ensure you add/increment the version number when sending the new version (i.e. [PATCH] -> [PATCH v2] -> [PATCH v3] -> ...). --- Guidelines: https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines Test framework: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest Test suite: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest-oe