Re: [PATCH 1/2] busybox: separate inittab into own package, due to SERIAL_CONSOLES being machine-specific

[Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>]

On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 05:25:25PM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-03-02 at 20:46 -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> > From: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@ti.com>
> > 
> > * Create busybox-inittab recipe to produce machine-specific package
> > with /etc/inittab
> >   and necessary getty calls for a machine, based on SERIAL_CONSOLES,
> > similar to how
> >   sysvinit-inittab was done
> > 
> > * Since CONFIG_FEATURE_USE_INITTAB is controlled by VIRTUAL-
> > RUNTIME_init_manager, make
> >   main busybox package RDEPENDS on busybox-inittab when init_manager
> > is set to busybox
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@ti.com>
> > ---
> >  .../recipes-core/busybox/busybox-inittab_1.27.2.bb | 32
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox.inc              | 12 ++------
> >  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox-
> > inittab_1.27.2.bb
> 
> 
> Can you send a patch to fix:
> 
> https://autobuilder.yocto.io/builders/nightly-oe-selftest/builds/878/steps/Running%20oe-selftest/logs/stdio
> 
> i.e. 
> 
> oe-selftest -r distrodata.Distrodata.test_maintainers
> 
> please? (missing maintainers entry for busybox-inittab)

Ah, I was hoping it would be covered by the main busybox entry...

Should I add myself for busybox-inittab, or original maintainer, Armin?

-- 
Denys