From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.seebs.net (mail.seebs.net [162.213.38.76]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA2897459C for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2018 15:39:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seebsdell (unknown [24.196.59.174]) by mail.seebs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9457C2E8928; Sat, 31 Mar 2018 10:39:55 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 10:39:53 -0500 From: Seebs To: Richard Purdie Message-ID: <20180331103954.6dc4a94a@seebsdell> In-Reply-To: <1522501975.11431.208.camel@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180327154802.14611-1-ross.burton@intel.com> <20180331000631.5f050451@seebsdell> <1522501975.11431.208.camel@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.1-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: OE Core mailing list Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] pseudo: intercept syscall() and return ENOTSUP for renameat2 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 15:39:55 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 14:12:55 +0100 Richard Purdie wrote: > I believe that libglib-2.0 does use syscall() for something and that > the above programs are calling into it and faulting. Interesting! I'll poke around and see what I can find. -s