From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com (mail-wm0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD9A72EDC for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 12:43:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f45.google.com with SMTP id t67so26036512wmt.0 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 05:43:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=vx0PSljEEnUqUiEYGVKKOHoDmSL2UDKqxUdkrt+u0nc=; b=gPU87MOBTHLAAidj5cxztseOTblxtHtfNR01SGKZGRun6hEtWVoHFjZF4ROUKyAYd1 45F2VdT8/Awuw4dBXfxiMZsUvLjtzJlvzwmlCKqAfqEyRAMWSR7cetnPhGluMsNP2va8 w7CRv/Zcimd+MBmOeLZezfdiAisFe9j3U/c9DkKdw6j/6jEEp7WOkNJXtNNgaRZqs0wv vP7dC/9OX7Ypyyy9s1rlwOhe/rOE5dZfz7X+3tZBunBZIxEusGvcjlQuA7O0ss9+lZgk k+IbBz7ylYazJ8h9NJ34zqcUFQ0LAuzWvAkuk1RTqGPZ2o3yOIlRHKcgwF2PWb/eY3Sk WCbA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=vx0PSljEEnUqUiEYGVKKOHoDmSL2UDKqxUdkrt+u0nc=; b=L/z/ineGvNNQpyixHFrs5RejHHLjAEf5Y0mbCLTG0Ez1nraZS6eZB08judzslbtEn9 XyhHqCngep2N7R0BE1INaA/yJKzg97qMvBRzCN07LEOMQm0aMw/ZhGFIYThSRfbFOIOy GRiKdq9+dfjdkQIOkFRBacbTE4OtWbzn3m4znhK9dBCjPSPM34++jBPuXKKG9x7qLUnr XAGVGU8GWXiZ3mQx4qk9ZClJX/7gdWShy8wyUNuGHPork0dvpO+jiZNt68eA6zVMxZfv A9FLoWXKsHxlMviVXDn9SpQG9bEmwdLJ5zBUQ+lt6gGx7qolgSfUeRejwrdemV8ZuR7p tfsg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBpUWQoNf+Nd1BCx13StUsrmaPiFkSe8c2fzT0edeqBDqKDVJ8d vhW2SpfnLtV9pZrOSHMyL+o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48k/WFb8K91oT20d2/WQVywwEO9g2cobzfUqueoCws2aDQ9qE3t+iMVqByhRTr6f45m/5BB5Q== X-Received: by 10.28.143.132 with SMTP id r126mr1501282wmd.45.1523364218430; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 05:43:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([217.30.68.212]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x22sm2204886wrd.69.2018.04.10.05.43.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 10 Apr 2018 05:43:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Martin Jansa X-Google-Original-From: Martin Jansa Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 14:43:38 +0200 To: Alexander Kanavin Message-ID: <20180410124338.GA1343@jama> References: <20180410120747.41814-1-alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180410120747.41814-1-alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] openssl: rename openssl 1.0.x to openssl10 and make openssl 1.1.x the default version X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 12:43:38 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 110426 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL" Content-Disposition: inline --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 03:07:43PM +0300, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > Openssl 1.0 can still be utilized by depending on 'openssl10' recipe. Does this really work now? I think it will fail again when both openssl versions end up in RSS. --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQRU+ejDffEzV2Je2oc3VSO3ZXaAHAUCWsyxeQAKCRA3VSO3ZXaA HBQjAKCJ0PIk8UNzj0ysapG7vgUQsK4iQgCglZcfKe2+052Ct2H0fiLzCmwTqzU= =geDP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL--