From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yw0-f195.google.com (mail-yw0-f195.google.com [209.85.161.195]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF66607F8 for ; Tue, 1 May 2018 00:25:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw0-f195.google.com with SMTP id g9-v6so3151011ywb.12 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 17:25:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=konsulko.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=fmdivkZJIDPHNM17JkFKeYSW11OLA0Txcuetwy0Xsps=; b=GJPGKuLiZGy2hjkwxz5OCYIVVHJvrneUo1jeXhgfguka+JVwdaSAFWqUL43/6R6Zd9 zoVshNwdg4J2q/5z4mF6KkpmajQ6b4Rz2puh43x5OyzfwyVc2VsTY63eYwvVnRUc/sEX 2RjaCFNRVo5cyDn1gtnffLL7Ipmc2daXsycsA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=fmdivkZJIDPHNM17JkFKeYSW11OLA0Txcuetwy0Xsps=; b=MzxDJHk3o6LE16K9hSXldsJckxPEEev9l7Mo4WNi1LYLx8SGMxFD2hjHDz9bxrkyNH 6/eMs6UgBWAiZGzoUIqPejiH2iJjBXo0PTbaB33xVzTOQu02s5jESfvIT8hfeuWB7SIr tZV6YNMx+OcaScZ5lGhCizl/hf0d0Yo4qPY67gOxVtQJOapnvaFgb6AivR1LL9mHqbq1 Kmti4j5j2K9XvDy+cOwYbx+A8OAAfsIU0Rm/P2VM4KuPI+wse7lLMrwofJ/oOQyhbAO3 +WmNTF4vZaTynfuOPSmHhzG/rwCHpvlS+3IEaq28RYcUBvJ01HTnecikMFcOAoABItPW um0g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tD4uvFvmCtXrufPC0OQXDgoa9yWnkCSftBhUHYcqNX9/M9qm5hH TFH/FTrOB8a+BcMKr8O7B4cajg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZrRHsPG85qzgoT0PcbOoLXxZY+LrKJovIKuM0qmFHRTlcePMrwQuVY4q5t+mDiSB0PbufYnkA== X-Received: by 2002:a81:ec14:: with SMTP id j20-v6mr7371582ywm.311.1525134334698; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 17:25:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bill-the-cat.ec.rr.com (cpe-65-184-142-68.ec.res.rr.com. [65.184.142.68]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y8-v6sm4069779ywy.99.2018.04.30.17.25.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Apr 2018 17:25:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 20:25:31 -0400 From: Tom Rini To: Otavio Salvador Message-ID: <20180501002531.GL31362@bill-the-cat.ec.rr.com> References: <8cc34667-5bb3-9642-40e2-d56b28f56646@prevas.dk> <32a348ed6176434db8178d29d7e1f183@SOC-EX01V.e01.socionext.com> <5ca366ed-3108-4a56-caaf-06b4f136d259@denx.de> <627e0fde-f97f-5c49-bc1a-325e7baa9072@linux.intel.com> <0802e876-fda0-d8d2-9dca-18ba8cbe073e@denx.de> <20180430202522.GK31362@bill-the-cat.ec.rr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Cc: Marek Vasut , Masahiro Yamada , Otavio Salvador , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2018.03 release X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 00:25:34 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 110863 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AfWARC8UWrCDHxRY" Content-Disposition: inline --AfWARC8UWrCDHxRY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 08:29:56PM +0000, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 5:25 PM Tom Rini wrote: >=20 > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 07:57:18PM +0000, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 4:53 PM Alexander Kanavin < > > > alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On 04/30/2018 08:25 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > >>>> Isn't it possible to solve your issue in the OE side? > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Can we NOT compile DTC alongside U-Boot somehow ? :) > > > > >>> That'd be the most desired solution IMO. > > > > >> > > > > >> Yes please. Can you adjust the recipes and classes in oe-core, a= nd > > > > >> remove the dtc recipe altogether? > > > > > > > > > > Remove dtc recipe ? Not sure I understand what you're implying. > > > > > > > If u-boot bundles dtc in its source tree, can we use that, and remo= ve > > > > the external dtc recipe? > > > > > > We shouldn't. The point in use the recipes inside OE-Core is because = our > > > bugfixes, patches and etc are used everywhere. If we use the bundled > copy > > > how we'd fix a host issue for example? Duplicate patches? >=20 > > What do you do for the kernel here? >=20 > We use our dtc-native. As we do for all other recipes (but few exceptions) Then you should also be doing swig-native, if I recall the other parts of this thread (or the other one?) correctly. --=20 Tom --AfWARC8UWrCDHxRY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJa57P5AAoJEIf59jXTHXZS0cYP/1xmBUJOc7pgCU9RPFlzW9xM shlA5WEB0DVU9h2uUH2hOHhs2gk0fpZZ5oTUwrAnSV09kZJ0kAMZnyHOC5Vc9wSk CSh91Y87A5px/Ct36Ts01gqLRXxcEF4O0wNMT4+zSQ5hHU/a59G6X/VKp48QyS1x XE95g2liYO6s13Z+Fg7mqJa9E3THiyrt4BzrNJhuJc/akWDnPaZ9MbWwwQpB9hq4 R7X1fImKbB+rphRVaBwST5wszfgKwoGgI4/2eGuPVB3VP20S1g7Wguq1emTxkDkG ZztG1DV7S4vVHUNpcx3rIoZFbT/970lZz1hoWzqAjesChdHI7aEIBOUwyvcMa9sV HAD5brDVsxHi4ZtSg+s7vgKqOWfyFwU7531pAasodph7164rkUC6F+ed7rsg4GsJ AgcCVrzyqmglWPsFfJFr6WUFDokd5ldpTOuXWWSBDRExpn3FDCHotAEpWbNtxbye HqhVf/T+gACDkkt+dX5pMrqePqBXyJsgrteZJh0TDlYf/AfMmKPL2vblzVChou9F wZKCsU6GMF3XEkLHtYim+tBStuhlsLVSz6iIU+qoykkluTSqlLueSOvKxVKVUT30 UjLRuiECXzvT3j+ieJ/we5HREWFP4eioNpZ515tHF5G0UJpAjY3vpgcbwSHKembz iDxnZ2eFV7KhQIhQMDRG =S7nD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AfWARC8UWrCDHxRY--