From: Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>
To: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: GCC 9 Drops Support For Older ARM Microarchitecture Versions
Date: Sat, 19 May 2018 15:33:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180519193341.GM19965@denix.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMKF1srt3AbRBgdBZp2ya-VkWm1K6r8eywFbqr3nMFe7EqNuFw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 11:07:55AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 9:21 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org> wrote:
> > https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=GCC-9-Dropping-Older-ARM
> >
> > Particularly, ARMv5 and ARMv5E are being dropped (but T and TE variants
> > remain)
> >
> > Are there any concerns from OE community perspective?
>
> From yocto project perspctive qemuarm which is emulating arm926ejs
> with default tune armv5te is used.
> so we are right at the trailing edge and wont be affected. However, I
> know there were OE users who had
> devices using other armv5 or v4 variants
>
> I have been suggesting to switch qemuarm to use armv7 based board
> emulator for few years now.
> may be this is the time to make that call for next YP release.
Valid point about qemuarm, but see below.
> > At least for binutils we needed this patch even for armv5te:
> > http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/tree/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/0007-Add-the-armv5e-architecture-to-binutils.patch
> >
>
> this patch technically required to support one of OEs available tune
> values. namely armv5e, we should be able to drop it.
$ grep conf/machine meta/conf/machine/qemuarm.conf
require conf/machine/include/qemu.inc
require conf/machine/include/tune-arm926ejs.inc
#require conf/machine/include/tune-arm1136jf-s.inc
$ MACHINE=qemuarm bitbake virtual/kernel -e|grep -E '^DEFAULTTUNE=|^ARMPKGSFX_THUMB=|^TUNE_PKGARCH=|^TUNE_CCARGS='
ARMPKGSFX_THUMB=""
DEFAULTTUNE="armv5te"
TUNE_CCARGS=" -march=armv5e -marm"
TUNE_PKGARCH="armv5e"
I have already tried binutils w/o that patch for arm926ejs/armv5te machine and
it fails, because as you can see above, -march=armv5e is being passed...
--
Denys
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-19 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-19 16:21 GCC 9 Drops Support For Older ARM Microarchitecture Versions Denys Dmytriyenko
2018-05-19 18:07 ` Khem Raj
2018-05-19 19:33 ` Denys Dmytriyenko [this message]
2018-05-19 21:26 ` Khem Raj
2018-05-20 0:57 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2018-05-20 14:59 ` akuster808
2018-05-23 19:48 ` Randy MacLeod
2018-05-23 21:01 ` Andre McCurdy
2018-05-23 21:40 ` Randy MacLeod
2018-05-23 21:59 ` Andre McCurdy
2018-05-24 0:06 ` Bruce Ashfield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180519193341.GM19965@denix.org \
--to=denis@denix.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=raj.khem@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox