From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: [PATCH 04/10] package: Drop subshell usage for dwarfsrcfile generation.
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 11:39:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180720103948.30044-4-richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180720103948.30044-1-richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The command for running dwarfsrcfiles is simple and does not need a subshell
for each execution. By expanding out this function to use check_output()
from subprocess and a list of arguments, the shell overhead can be dropped.
For recipes with lots of files this gives a significant saving.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
---
meta/classes/package.bbclass | 12 ++++++++++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes/package.bbclass b/meta/classes/package.bbclass
index 6f7015d9129..7a49e4f3516 100644
--- a/meta/classes/package.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/package.bbclass
@@ -345,8 +345,16 @@ def parse_debugsources_from_dwarfsrcfiles_output(dwarfsrcfiles_output):
return debugfiles.keys()
def append_source_info(file, sourcefile, d, fatal=True):
- cmd = "'dwarfsrcfiles' '%s'" % (file)
- (retval, output) = oe.utils.getstatusoutput(cmd)
+ import subprocess
+
+ cmd = ["dwarfsrcfiles", file]
+ try:
+ output = subprocess.check_output(cmd, universal_newlines=True, stderr=subprocess.STDOUT)
+ retval = 0
+ except subprocess.CalledProcessError as exc:
+ output = exc.output
+ retval = exc.returncode
+
# 255 means a specific file wasn't fully parsed to get the debug file list, which is not a fatal failure
if retval != 0 and retval != 255:
msg = "dwarfsrcfiles failed with exit code %s (cmd was %s)%s" % (retval, cmd, ":\n%s" % output if output else "")
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-20 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-20 10:39 [PATCH 01/10] utils: Add multiprocess_launch API and testcase Richard Purdie
2018-07-20 10:39 ` [PATCH 02/10] package: Rework PACKAGELOCK based upon sstate for do_packagedata Richard Purdie
2018-07-20 10:39 ` [PATCH 03/10] package_ipk|deb: Use oe.utils.multiprocess_launch Richard Purdie
2018-07-20 10:39 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2018-07-20 10:39 ` [PATCH 05/10] package: Don't use subshell to execute file Richard Purdie
2018-07-20 10:39 ` [PATCH 06/10] package: Allow parallel processing of debug splitting Richard Purdie
2018-07-20 10:39 ` [PATCH 07/10] package: Allow parallel processing of shlib analysis Richard Purdie
2018-07-20 10:39 ` [PATCH 08/10] package: Refactor to remove isElf/is_elf function duplication Richard Purdie
2018-07-20 10:39 ` [PATCH 09/10] package: Call file to determine elf status in parallel Richard Purdie
2018-07-20 10:39 ` [PATCH 10/10] sstate/bitbake.conf: Use pigz if available Richard Purdie
2018-07-20 11:02 ` ✗ patchtest: failure for "utils: Add multiprocess_launch..." and 9 more Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180720103948.30044-4-richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox