Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patchwork <patchwork@patchwork.openembedded.org>
To: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: ✗ patchtest: failure for deployed artifacts naming improvements
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2018 22:34:19 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180819223419.13842.37001@do.openembedded.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1534716156.git.Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>

== Series Details ==

Series: deployed artifacts naming improvements
Revision: 1
URL   : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/13599/
State : failure

== Summary ==


Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is
an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the proposed
series by patchtest resulting in the following failures:



* Patch            [1/6] bitbake.conf, kernel-artifact-names.bbclass: introduce IMAGE_VERSION_SUFFIX instead of using DATETIME directly
 Issue             Commit shortlog is too long [test_shortlog_length] 
  Suggested fix    Edit shortlog so that it is 90 characters or less (currently 110 characters)



If you believe any of these test results are incorrect, please reply to the
mailing list (openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org) raising your concerns.
Otherwise we would appreciate you correcting the issues and submitting a new
version of the patchset if applicable. Please ensure you add/increment the
version number when sending the new version (i.e. [PATCH] -> [PATCH v2] ->
[PATCH v3] -> ...).

---
Guidelines:     https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines
Test framework: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest
Test suite:     http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest-oe



      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-08-19 22:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-19 22:15 [PATCH 0/6] deployed artifacts naming improvements Martin Jansa
2018-08-19 22:15 ` [PATCH 1/6] bitbake.conf, kernel-artifact-names.bbclass: introduce IMAGE_VERSION_SUFFIX instead of using DATETIME directly Martin Jansa
2018-08-19 22:15 ` [PATCH 2/6] kernel-artifact-names, kernel-fitimage: add KERNEL_FIT_BASE_NAME, KERNEL_FIT_SYMLINK_NAME variables Martin Jansa
2018-08-19 22:16 ` [PATCH 3/6] kernel*.bbclass: rename *_SYMLINK_NAME variables to *_LINK_NAME and *_BASE_NAME to *_NAME Martin Jansa
2018-08-19 22:16 ` [PATCH 4/6] kernel-artifact-names.bbclass, kernel.bbclass: remove prefix and extension from MODULE_TARBALL_* variables Martin Jansa
2018-08-19 22:16 ` [PATCH 5/6] kernel-artifact-names.bbclass: Add 2 more variables to make it easier to change all names with one variable Martin Jansa
2018-08-19 22:16 ` [PATCH 6/6] kernel.bbclass: rename type variable to imageType Martin Jansa
2018-08-19 22:34 ` Patchwork [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180819223419.13842.37001@do.openembedded.org \
    --to=patchwork@patchwork.openembedded.org \
    --cc=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox